Nowadays, some companies that support their employees should wear clothes which are formal, other organisations think that, the quantity of work which is done by workers is öuch important than how they look like. These views have both pros and cons and this essay will explore the main points of both.
On the one hand, some bosses think that, workers should wear suits in commission while they are doing their job. Most common objections about this view are generally related with disciplined out looking. For instance, newest researches which are done by business researchers are showing that, the amount of successful employers in tough ruled companies is much higher than others. For the reason that, sometimes out looking might be a key factor to being a highly qualified company, but does it accurate to be strict that much about dressing rules? If the authorities which are ruling the company have not taken precautions, it would cause some issues which are challenging to tackle with it.
On the other hand, other authorities are supporting that, good-looking is not a big feature while working in office. To illustrate that, some extremely huge technology brands such as Google and IBM supports to provide the most enjoyable conditions for their employees. Furthermore, they do not use strict and unbearable dressing rules for their workers. They are not interested in what their personnel look like. These kind of companies are generally interested in with what their personnel do.
To summarise, strict dressing routines are unnecessary for employees. In my opinion, workers have to be happy and quite soft while they are working. It might be useful to provide enjoyable commission conditions as a boss. I suggesting employees have to be fully free, but they have to be mostly free. However, there are also rules required. They must wear clothes which are fitted on with office and working atmosphere.
Nowadays,
some
companies
that support their
employees
should wear clothes which are formal,
other
organisations
think
that, the quantity of work which
is done
by
workers
is
öuch
important
than how they look like. These views have both pros and cons and this essay will explore the main points of both.
On the one hand,
some
bosses
think
that,
workers
should wear suits in commission while they are doing their job. Most common objections about this view are
generally
related with disciplined out looking.
For instance
,
newest
researches which
are done
by business researchers are showing that, the amount of successful employers in tough ruled
companies
is much higher than others. For the reason that,
sometimes
out looking might be a key factor to being a
highly
qualified
company
,
but
does it accurate to be strict that much about dressing
rules
? If the authorities which are ruling the
company
have not taken precautions, it would cause
some
issues which are challenging
to tackle
with it.
On the
other
hand,
other
authorities are supporting that,
good
-looking is not a
big
feature while working in office. To illustrate that,
some
extremely
huge technology brands such as Google and IBM supports to provide the most enjoyable conditions for their
employees
.
Furthermore
, they do not
use
strict and unbearable dressing
rules
for their
workers
. They are not interested in what their personnel look like.
These kind
of
companies
are
generally
interested in with what their personnel do.
To
summarise
, strict dressing routines are unnecessary for
employees
. In my opinion,
workers
have to
be happy and quite soft while they are working. It might be useful to provide enjoyable commission conditions as a boss.
I suggesting
employees
have to
be
fully
free,
but
they
have to
be
mostly
free.
However
, there are
also
rules
required. They
must
wear clothes which
are fitted
on with office and working atmosphere.