TPO 30Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to v.1
TPO 30 It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to v. 1
It is true that these days in many nations, people in urban areas are more likely to have nuclear or singular families rather than extended family units. In my opinion, I believe that this is a positive trend as it is beneficial for individuals in terms of re-location and financial stability.
On the one hand, it is evident that smaller families can easily alter their living places in cities. In other words, the modern lifestyle is geared towards nuclear families, thus re-locating from one place to another is much more convenient compared to a large family. For example, individuals live in highly developed cities are less likely to purchase their property due to the soaring house prices in the area, so the majority of people tend to rent out apartments, and usually, these apartments can accommodate fewer people. Therefore, nuclear families can effortlessly fit into these places than larger families.
On the other hand, the financial burden in smaller family units is minimum due to the less number of family members. It is seen that most of the amenities in urban places are exorbitant, and people often have to struggle to improve their standards of living financially. In city schools, for example, have higher tuition fees compared to the suburbs, and therefore, by having one or two children in the family, parents can manage their expenses, whilst providing advanced, well-renowned education for their children. Therefore, children in cities understand the importance of money and can act responsibly from their early stages.
In conclusion, I think that smaller families are more suited to urban life compared to extended families.
It is true that these days in
many
nations,
people
in urban areas are more likely to have nuclear or singular
families
rather
than extended
family
units. In my opinion, I believe that this is a
positive
trend as it is beneficial for individuals in terms of re-location and financial stability.
On the one hand, it is evident that smaller
families
can
easily
alter their living
places
in
cities
.
In other words
, the modern lifestyle
is geared
towards nuclear
families
,
thus
re-locating from one
place
to another is much more convenient compared to a large
family
.
For example
, individuals
live
in
highly
developed
cities
are less likely to
purchase
their property due to the soaring
house
prices in the area,
so
the majority of
people
tend to rent out apartments, and
usually
, these apartments can accommodate fewer
people
.
Therefore
, nuclear
families
can
effortlessly
fit into these
places
than larger families.
On the other hand
, the financial burden in smaller
family
units is minimum due to the less number of
family
members. It is
seen
that most of the amenities in urban
places
are exorbitant, and
people
often
have to
struggle to
improve
their standards of living
financially
. In city schools,
for example
, have higher tuition fees compared to the suburbs, and
therefore
, by having one or two children in the
family
, parents can manage their expenses, whilst providing advanced, well-renowned education for their children.
Therefore
, children in
cities
understand the importance of money and can act
responsibly
from their early stages.
In conclusion
, I
think
that smaller
families
are more suited to urban life compared to extended
families
.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes