Whether or not international cooperation should tackle to the alarming issues has been a matter of debate since the beginning of the twenty-first century. While there are a lot of benefits of the international organization, I would argue that it is better to address some difficulties in its own country by the national cooperation.
In the first place, there are some reasons to believe that global collaboration has responsibility for finding a solution to emerge. For instance, global warming, natural disaster, infectious disease may have a negative impact on the global scale. Therefore, they usually require a lot of money from financial resource of worldwide organizations. In addition to that, fossil fuels like oil and gas are running out, people are cutting down enormous areas of rainforest and destroying wildlife habitats. The international cooperation should introduce laws to limit emissions from factories, invest in renewable energy from solar, wind and water power and natural areas and wild animals should be protected.
In the second place, many kinds of urgent matters cannot be solved by international association but also by national assistances. For example, educational issues do not need action from other areas. If government can solve important problems like building educational system, having a good quality education, individuals will also trust in the government and have an obligation to themselves. The other reason is the distinct conditions of every country. As each nation has own difficulties related to culture, climate, politics which can only tackle by their government.
In conclusion, although international collaboration brings a great number of benefits to solve immediate matters on global scales, I believe that national organization should also contribute their efforts to improving these problems on the national scale.
Whether or not
international
cooperation should tackle to the alarming issues has been a matter of debate since the beginning of the twenty-
first
century. While there are
a lot of
benefits of the
international
organization, I would argue that it is better to address
some
difficulties in its
own
country by the
national
cooperation.
In the
first
place, there are
some
reasons to believe that
global
collaboration has responsibility for finding a solution to emerge.
For instance
,
global
warming, natural disaster, infectious disease may have a
negative
impact on the
global
scale.
Therefore
, they
usually
require
a lot of
money from financial resource of worldwide organizations.
In addition
to that, fossil fuels like oil and gas are running out,
people
are cutting down enormous areas of rainforest and destroying wildlife habitats. The
international
cooperation should introduce laws to limit emissions from factories, invest in renewable energy from solar, wind and water power and natural areas and wild animals should
be protected
.
In the second place,
many
kinds of urgent matters cannot
be solved
by
international
association
but
also
by
national
assistances
.
For example
, educational issues do not need action from other areas. If
government
can solve
important
problems like building educational system, having a
good
quality education, individuals will
also
trust in the
government
and have an obligation to themselves. The other reason is the distinct conditions of every country. As each nation has
own
difficulties related to culture, climate, politics which can
only
tackle by their
government
.
In conclusion
, although
international
collaboration brings a great number of benefits to solve immediate matters on
global
scales, I believe that
national
organization should
also
contribute their efforts to improving these problems on the
national
scale.