It is true that some people believe that cross-national cooperation is the only measure that can be tackled the majority of the emergent issues. While I accept that this may suit many people, I believe that not all acute problems can be coped with international organizations.
On the one hand, it is widely agreed that many issues have reached a global level and only through the cooperation of a wide range of countries can be addressed. Firstly, global warming is an increasing concern for human around the world. For example, the famous Kyoto Protocol is the result of international cooperation, which has been implemented for many years in an attempt to reduce the emission of greenhouse gas. Secondly, our world is facing lots of terrorism, there are many murders and bombing which need worldwide support and assistance. For instance, multi-national cooperation needs to tackled terrorist acts from the Islamic State (IS), which has taken the lives of many innocent people in the world.
On the other hand, most alarming problems can solely be coped with the local authorities. First, education, health, and poverty can only be solved by their governments. In particular, the global support’s aid is temporary, therefore the governments have to implement the good policies to develop their countries, give poor people chances to improve their standard of living. Furthermore, corruption is the urgent issues that can only be dealing with the independent development and reform of individual countries. The international organization has no authority to inquiry a country’s government, which can only be prevented by the residents and officials.
In conclusion, while the cross-national organization is an effective way in dealing with many of acute problems, it seems to me that there are also a large number of urgent issues that require the domestic resolution and action instead of global support.
It is true that
some
people
believe that cross-national
cooperation
is the
only
measure that can
be tackled
the majority of the emergent
issues
. While I accept that this may suit
many
people
, I believe that not all acute problems can
be coped
with international organizations.
On the one hand, it is
widely
agreed
that
many
issues
have reached a
global
level and
only
through the
cooperation
of a wide range of
countries
can
be addressed
.
Firstly
,
global
warming is an increasing concern for human around the world.
For example
, the
famous
Kyoto Protocol is the result of international
cooperation
, which has
been implemented
for
many
years in an attempt to
reduce
the emission of greenhouse gas.
Secondly
, our world is facing lots of terrorism, there are
many
murders and bombing which need worldwide support and assistance.
For instance
, multi-national
cooperation
needs to tackled terrorist acts from the Islamic State (IS), which has taken the
lives
of
many
innocent
people
in the world.
On the other hand
, most alarming problems can
solely
be coped
with the local authorities.
First
, education, health, and poverty can
only
be solved
by their
governments
.
In particular
, the
global
support’s aid is temporary,
therefore
the
governments
have to
implement the
good
policies to develop their
countries
, give poor
people
chances
to
improve
their standard of living.
Furthermore
, corruption is the urgent
issues
that can
only
be dealing with the independent development and reform of individual
countries
. The international organization has no authority to inquiry a
country’s
government
, which can
only
be
prevented
by the residents and officials.
In conclusion
, while the cross-national organization is an effective way in dealing with
many
of acute problems, it seems to me that there are
also
a large number of
urgent
issues
that require the domestic resolution and action
instead
of
global
support.