Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree? v.5

Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work. v. 5
Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree? In this capitalistic world, everything is monetized and art is no exception. Society, these days, is abuzz over a debate that the majority of artists are not adequately paid for their work. Hence, the government should intervene and pay them fairly so that their work could proceed unabated. I strongly believe that the government should bail out the under paid artist due to the following reasons. The first and the foremost reason is my penchant for and personal inclination towards arts and artists. I am a great admirer and fond of art and therefore hold artists in high regards. Thus, I strongly advocate that the artists struggling financially must be assisted by the government. For instance, there are some European countries where the government has established dedicated agencies for the promotion of the artists which is indeed a great initiative. Moreover, it is an established fact and a natural human phenomenon that our mental productivity is adversely affected by stress and worries. Therefore, it is imperative that artists facing financial woes must receive monetary support in order to relieve them of all the worries caused by the financial constraints. In this way, they would be able to flourish and thrive, which will consequently enhance their imaginative and creative skill and they would continue to inspire and influence others with their work. Furthermore, a strong art sector would be an economic asset and spur business activity and growth. Therefore, by supporting and appreciating art and artist, government can enjoy a good return on investment in terms of tax revenues. For instance, there are various western countries which have an unrivalled reputation for their art sector, which contributes significantly towards the economic growth of such countries. Therefore, on the basis of aforementioned reasons, it would be justified to say that government must lend a helping hand to struggling artists to promote and appreciate them, to foster creativity and to benefit from economic gains, art sector can offer.
Most
artists
earn low salaries and should
therefore
receive funding from the
government
in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you
agree
?

In this capitalistic world, everything
is monetized
and
art
is no exception. Society, these days, is abuzz over a debate that the majority of
artists
are not
adequately
paid for their work.
Hence
, the
government
should intervene and pay them
fairly
so
that their work could proceed unabated. I
strongly
believe that the
government
should bail out the under paid
artist
due to the following reasons.

The
first
and the foremost reason is my penchant for and personal inclination towards
arts
and
artists
. I am a great admirer and fond of
art
and
therefore
hold
artists
in high regards.
Thus
, I
strongly
advocate that the
artists
struggling
financially
must
be assisted
by the
government
.
For instance
, there are
some
European countries where the
government
has established dedicated agencies for the promotion of the
artists
which is
indeed
a great initiative.

Moreover
, it is
an established fact
and a natural human phenomenon that our mental productivity is
adversely
affected
by
stress
and worries.
Therefore
, it is imperative that
artists
facing financial woes
must
receive monetary support in order to relieve them of all the worries caused by the financial constraints. In this way, they would be able to flourish and thrive, which will
consequently
enhance their imaginative and creative
skill and
they would continue to inspire and influence others with their work.

Furthermore
, a strong
art
sector would be an economic asset and spur business activity and growth.
Therefore
, by supporting and appreciating
art
and
artist
,
government
can enjoy a
good
return on investment in terms of tax revenues.
For instance
, there are various western countries which have an unrivalled reputation for their
art
sector, which contributes
significantly
towards the economic growth of such countries.

Therefore
, on the basis of aforementioned reasons, it would
be justified
to say that
government
must
lend a helping hand to struggling
artists
to promote and appreciate them, to foster creativity and to benefit from economic gains,
art
sector can offer.
19Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
28Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes

IELTS essay Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work. v. 5

Essay
  American English
6 paragraphs
353 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts