Many people are of the opinion that artists who do not earn a decent income should be supported by the union. I do not agree with this point of view because I believe ministry funding should be spent on pressing social problems and also because artists can find alternative sources of income to support themselves.
Government funding should be used to deal with pressing problems rather than support artists. Investment in the art industry contributes little to improving the standard of living of the general public. Art, after all, has been considered as luxury item by the majority of people and has nothing to do with their everyday life. By contrast, education and health care are more closely related to people’s wellbeing. By pouring more money into these areas, the authority can make education more affordable and accessible for young people and thus provide them better opportunities for their future employment. At the same time, state funding also enables medical facilities function properly and this can offer better health services to citizens. All these improvements contribute to the betterment of people’s lives.
Moreover, like any other professionals, artists can find other financial resources and support themselves. To begin with, artists can cooperate with other organizations and companies by providing creative ideas and graphic designs. This helps them to earn extra income and reduce their reliance on authority help. Another point is that artists nowadays can take advantages of the modern technology such as social media networking to promote their own artworks and sell them worldwide.
To conclude, in my perspective, union funding should be spent on education and health care so as to benefit more people and artists should find alternative financial resources by selling their creative ideas and artworks.
Many
people
are of the opinion that
artists
who do not earn a decent income should
be supported
by the union. I do not
agree
with this point of view
because
I believe ministry
funding
should
be spent
on pressing social problems and
also
because
artists
can find alternative sources of income to support themselves.
Government
funding
should be
used
to deal with pressing problems
rather
than support
artists
. Investment in the art industry contributes
little
to improving the standard of living of the
general public
. Art,
after all
, has
been considered
as luxury item by the majority of
people
and has nothing to do with their everyday life. By contrast, education and health care are more
closely
related to
people’s
wellbeing
. By pouring more money into these areas, the authority can
make
education more affordable and accessible for young
people
and
thus
provide them better opportunities for their future employment. At the same time, state
funding
also
enables medical facilities function
properly
and this can offer better health services to citizens. All these improvements contribute to the betterment of
people’s
lives
.
Moreover
, like any other professionals,
artists
can find other financial resources and support themselves. To
begin
with,
artists
can cooperate with other organizations and
companies
by providing creative
ideas
and graphic designs. This
helps
them to earn extra income and
reduce
their reliance on authority
help
. Another point is that
artists
nowadays can take advantages of the modern technology such as social media networking to promote their
own
artworks and sell them worldwide.
To conclude
, in my perspective, union
funding
should
be spent
on education and health care
so as to
benefit more
people
and
artists
should find alternative financial resources by selling their creative
ideas
and artworks.