IT IS SAID THET, NEW CITIES IS DEMANDING SPECIAL ARTISTS IN IMPORTANT AREAS THAN IN EVERY SINGLE. SO, SOME BELIEVE THAT THESE PEOPLE SHOULD BE PAID BY THE AUTHORITIES FOR EDUCATION. BUT, IF IT EXCLUSIVE FROM CITIZENS WISH THEN THEY SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. FROM MY POINT OF VIEW, THESE WAY OF STUDYING SYSTEM CAN HAVE SOME BENEFITS AND DRAWBACKS TO THEM.
TO BEGIN WITH, IF THE GOVERNMENT FUND FOR THE EDUCATION OF STUDENT CAREER WHICH IS WISHED BY THE SOCIETY MEMBERS THEN THESE CHILDREN CAN HELP TO DEVELOP THEIR PLACES. TO BE CLEAR, THEY CAN FULFILL THE NEED OF THEIR NEIGHBOURS. THEY CAN GET SOME NEW CHANGES BY DOING ALL THIS, NEW GENERATION CAN SEEK KNOWLEDGE AND WILL DO THE SAME FOR THE FUTURE. FOR EXAMPLE, IF YOUNSTER LEARN TO CREATE BUSINESS IN A NEARBY AREA FROM WHERE JOB OPPURTUNITIES INCREASE FOR POOR PEOPLE. IN THIS WAY, THEY CAN PASS THIS TO NEXT FUTURE.
ON THE OTHER HAND, IT HAS SOME NEGATIVE SIDES. GRANT GIVEN BY THE AUTHORITIES FOR STUDY SUBJECT CAN CREATE SOME AWARENESS AMONG PEOPLE. THIS CAN LEAD TO CONFLICTS OR WAR BETWEEN THEM. ANOTHER NEGATIVE EFFECT OF THIS IS THAT, MORE NAD MORE CHILDREN CHOSE ONLY THAT FIELD AND NOT OTHERS. SUCH AS, IF THEY PAY FOR POLITICAL STUDIES THEN OTHER IMPORTANT SUBJECT LOOSE THEIR STUDENTS. FINALLY, NOBODY TAKE OTHER VITAL COURSES LIKE A BUSINESS, DOCTOR AND SO ON.
IN CONCLUSION, ATER THIS DISCUSSION, I WOULD SAY THAT, THERE ARE MORE NEGATIVE AFFECTS THAN POSITIVE FOR THIS RULE OF EDUCATING PEOPLE. THESE CAN CREATE CONFLICTS AND PEOPLE WILL CHOSE ONLY THAT COURSE WHILE, OTHER COURSES WILL BE TAKEN BY ONLY FEW PEOPLE.
IT
IS SAID
THET
, NEW CITIES IS DEMANDING SPECIAL ARTISTS IN
IMPORTANT
AREAS THAN IN EVERY SINGLE.
SO
,
SOME
BELIEVE THAT THESE
PEOPLE
SHOULD
BE PAID
BY THE AUTHORITIES FOR EDUCATION.
BUT
, IF IT EXCLUSIVE FROM CITIZENS WISH THEN THEY SHOULD NOT
BE GRANTED
. FROM MY POINT OF VIEW, THESE WAY OF STUDYING SYSTEM CAN HAVE
SOME
BENEFITS AND DRAWBACKS TO THEM.
TO
BEGIN
WITH, IF THE
GOVERNMENT
FUND FOR THE EDUCATION OF STUDENT CAREER WHICH
IS WISHED
BY THE SOCIETY MEMBERS THEN THESE CHILDREN CAN
HELP
TO DEVELOP THEIR PLACES. TO BE
CLEAR
, THEY CAN FULFILL THE NEED OF THEIR
NEIGHBOURS
. THEY CAN
GET
SOME
NEW
CHANGES
BY DOING ALL THIS, NEW GENERATION CAN SEEK KNOWLEDGE AND WILL DO THE SAME FOR THE FUTURE.
FOR EXAMPLE
, IF
YOUNSTER
LEARN TO CREATE BUSINESS IN A NEARBY AREA FROM WHERE JOB
OPPURTUNITIES
INCREASE FOR POOR
PEOPLE
. IN THIS WAY, THEY CAN PASS THIS TO
NEXT
FUTURE.
ON THE
OTHER
HAND, IT HAS
SOME
NEGATIVE
SIDES. GRANT
GIVEN
BY THE AUTHORITIES FOR STUDY SUBJECT CAN CREATE
SOME
AWARENESS AMONG
PEOPLE
. THIS CAN LEAD TO CONFLICTS OR WAR BETWEEN THEM. ANOTHER
NEGATIVE
EFFECT OF THIS IS THAT, MORE NAD MORE CHILDREN CHOSE
ONLY
THAT FIELD AND NOT OTHERS. SUCH AS, IF THEY PAY FOR POLITICAL STUDIES THEN
OTHER
IMPORTANT
SUBJECT
LOOSE
THEIR STUDENTS.
FINALLY
, NOBODY
TAKE
OTHER
VITAL COURSES LIKE A BUSINESS, DOCTOR AND
SO
ON.
IN CONCLUSION
, ATER THIS DISCUSSION, I WOULD SAY THAT, THERE ARE MORE
NEGATIVE
AFFECTS THAN
POSITIVE
FOR THIS
RULE
OF EDUCATING
PEOPLE
. THESE CAN CREATE CONFLICTS AND
PEOPLE
WILL CHOSE
ONLY
THAT COURSE WHILE,
OTHER
COURSES WILL
BE TAKEN
BY
ONLY
FEW
PEOPLE
.