The people share a common discourse over a role of public transportation, relating to a price of air transporter agencies. This argument divides the people into two campuses, proponents and opponents. The Proponents believe that it is important for these ticket prices to be affordable for everyone. However, there is an another vision says that a depending on public transportation escalates a phenomenon of the green house.
Firstly, there are two reasons why the supportive side adamantly supports the affordable prices for these tickets. Firstly, it needlessly to says that people like to travel for logical reasons. In terms of the humanitarian, if there some labours, working in blue-collar jobs, and getting low wage, could not be able to pay a high fee for these tickets. While if these companies reduced their price for their customers, it would help these works. Secondly, it is not surprising that the public transport participates in fighting the global warming. For example, when thousands of people share with a motor, and buses, they would reduce the emission of carbon dioxide accused as an intrinsic reason of global warming.
On the other hand, it is also worthwhile to note that sceptical side has adverse opinion, supporting their vision with rationale reasons. Firstly, this type of transportation leads to several catastrophic pollution crises. In terms of air pollution, the aircraft emits a lot of contaminated gas destructing any active campaigns to reduce the gas pollution. Moreover, If the world neglected this, it would lead to serious issues. This reason why the ice and glacier in the North and the South poles of the earth is melting, this situation will destroy some cities in our world, if we do not take urgent action.
In conclusion, it truly says that the cheapest ticket for air transport will encourage people to travel, but also it carries inherent risks.
The
people
share a common discourse over a role of public transportation, relating to a
price
of air transporter agencies. This argument divides the
people
into two campuses, proponents and opponents. The Proponents believe that it is
important
for these
ticket
prices
to be affordable for everyone.
However
, there is
an another vision
says that a depending on public transportation escalates a phenomenon of the green
house
.
Firstly
, there are two
reasons
why the supportive side
adamantly
supports the affordable
prices
for these
tickets
.
Firstly
, it
needlessly
to says that
people
like to travel for logical
reasons
. In terms of the humanitarian, if there
some
labours
, working in blue-collar jobs, and getting low wage, could not be able to pay a high fee for these
tickets
. While if these
companies
reduced
their
price
for their customers, it would
help
these works.
Secondly
, it is not surprising that the public transport participates in fighting the global warming.
For example
, when thousands of
people
share with a motor, and buses, they would
reduce
the emission of carbon dioxide accused as an intrinsic
reason
of global warming.
On the other hand
, it is
also
worthwhile to note that
sceptical
side has adverse opinion, supporting their vision with rationale
reasons
.
Firstly
, this type of transportation leads to several catastrophic pollution crises. In terms of air pollution, the aircraft emits
a lot of
contaminated gas destructing any active campaigns to
reduce
the gas pollution.
Moreover
, If the world neglected this, it would lead to serious issues. This
reason
why the ice and glacier in the North and the South poles of the earth is melting, this situation will
destroy
some
cities in our world, if we do not take urgent action.
In conclusion
, it
truly
says that the cheapest
ticket
for air transport will encourage
people
to travel,
but
also
it carries inherent
risks
.