Some people put forward the opinion that the government should build the speed transportation infrastructure. But there are strong counter arguments by a section of people who think that authority has to improve the road quality and find a way to save the country’s nature. I am of the opinion that this matter should be debated in light of several factors before any conclusion can be drawn.
First and foremost, high-speed public transports such as train, light rapid trains, trams are able to save people’s time. They can get to the final destination in one or two hours and spend their golden times with family or loved ones. For instance, the journey had taken ten hours from Almaty to Astana by Soviet unions designed old trains. Several years ago, Kazakhstan authorities have finished the rapid train railways. As a result, passengers are spending two hours between main cities of countries. People are not tired and less stressed after the voyage. They can dedicate the saved time to own development and read books or surf the Internet.
However, one point which I believe to be absolutely pivotal is the fact that high-speed public transport’s infrastructure costs billions of dollars. This money can be spent to ameliorate rural and urban car roads. Since high-quality roads reduce car accidents and death tolls. Also, the state has to destroy forests and natural resorts in order to build rapid railways. If the government is to save the country’s flora and fauna, they must propagandize bicycle sport. Moreover, the authority has to provide with more cycling roads and revolutionize healthiest and cheapest lifestyle.
In conclusion, although there are a number of different points of view regarding this issue, I claim that government should ameliorate car roads in order to decrease accidents. Moreover, states have to foster the nation’s economy, enhance GDP, reduce transport ticket price and then build rapid transports.
Some
people
put forward the opinion that the
government
should build the speed transportation infrastructure.
But
there are strong counter arguments by a section of
people
who
think
that authority
has to
improve
the
road
quality and find a way to save the country’s nature. I am of the opinion that this matter should
be debated
in light of several factors
before
any conclusion can
be drawn
.
First
and foremost, high-speed public
transports
such as
train
, light
rapid
trains
, trams are able to save
people’s
time. They can
get
to the final destination in one or two hours and spend their golden times with family or
loved
ones.
For instance
, the journey had taken ten hours from Almaty to Astana by Soviet unions designed
old
trains
. Several years ago, Kazakhstan authorities have finished the
rapid
train
railways.
As a result
, passengers are spending two hours between main cities of countries.
People
are not tired and less
stressed
after the voyage. They can dedicate the saved time to
own
development and read books or surf the Internet.
However
, one point which I believe to be
absolutely
pivotal is the fact that high-speed public
transport’s
infrastructure costs billions of dollars. This money can
be spent
to ameliorate rural and urban car
roads
. Since high-quality
roads
reduce
car accidents and death tolls.
Also
, the state
has to
destroy
forests and natural resorts in order to build
rapid
railways. If the
government
is to save the country’s flora and fauna, they
must
propagandize bicycle sport.
Moreover
, the authority
has to
provide with more cycling
roads
and revolutionize healthiest and cheapest lifestyle.
In conclusion
, although there are a number of
different
points of view regarding this issue, I claim that
government
should ameliorate car
roads
in order to decrease accidents.
Moreover
, states
have to
foster the nation’s economy, enhance GDP,
reduce
transport
ticket price and then build
rapid
transports
.