Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environmental conservation. Discuss both views and give you v.3

Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environmental conservation. 3
Maintaining transport is an imperative element in government purview. While some cite that it is necessary to spend money on faster public transportation and others say that it should spend on other features like conserving the environment and reducing the cost of transportation. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the spectrum and draw my opinion. On one hand, there are some people believe that it is an irrefutable fact that a country needs a public transport which is fast, as it accelerates the economy of the country. Many people prefer metros than conventional buses which might be stuck in congestions, as a result, they could be able to reach their work locations and spend some quality and quantity time with family. If the transport is slow then commuters might not reach offices in time and could be penalized. This could be seen in increasing number of people preferring tube in Bangalore than government buses. So government spending money on the faster mode of transport is significant. On the other hand, a comparative number of people say that instead of squandering public taxes on faster transport, they could spend it on other elements of transportation. There is a massive development in recent years and many urban places are expanding rapidly in the name of development which includes roads and transport. Government is cutting down the trees and building roads which is a negative impact on the environment, instead, they can spend on constructing flyovers and eco-friendly roads which is not hazardous to nature. With the advancement of new technology, the latest vehicles will give a greater mileage which is cost-effective. Authorities could invest some amount on these technologies which could be less costly. In conclusion, this essay discussed why some people think that the government needs to spend tax money on faster transportation and why other people say that need to spend on other aspects of transportation. According to my perspective, faster transportation is necessary, but we need to think about cost and environment, there is no good in it? If we are fast with a lot of pollution and high price.
Maintaining
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
is an imperative element in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
purview. While
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
cite that it is necessary to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spend
money on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
faster
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
and others
say that it should
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spend
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
features like conserving the environment and reducing the cost of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the spectrum and draw my opinion.

On one hand, there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
believe that it is an irrefutable fact that a country
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
needs
a public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
which is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
, as it accelerates the economy of the country.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
prefer metros than conventional buses which might
be stuck
in congestions,
as a result
, they could be able to reach their work locations and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spend
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
quality and quantity time with family. If the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
is slow then commuters might not reach offices in time and could
be penalized
. This could be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
in increasing number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
preferring tube in Bangalore than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
buses.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
spending money on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
faster
mode of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
is significant.

On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, a comparative number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
say that
instead
of squandering public taxes on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
faster
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
, they could
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spend
it on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
elements of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
. There is a massive development in recent years and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
urban places are expanding
rapidly
in the name of development which includes roads and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Government
is cutting down the trees and building roads which is a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
impact on the environment,
instead
, they can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spend
on constructing flyovers and eco-friendly roads which is not hazardous to nature. With the advancement of new technology, the latest vehicles will give a greater mileage which
is cost
-effective. Authorities could invest
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
amount on these technologies which could be less costly.

In conclusion
, this essay discussed why
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
needs
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spend
tax money on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
faster
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
and why
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
say that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
need
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spend
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
aspects of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
. According to my perspective,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
faster
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
is necessary,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
we
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
need
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
about cost and environment, there is no
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
in it? If we are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
pollution and high price.
5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
44Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes

IELTS essay Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environmental conservation. 3

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
354 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts