Whilst some member of the society underscore the importance of technological advanced equipment for increasing working standards of employees on their workplace, others advocates that introducing these high-tech machines have no convenience to workers. There are rational arguments on both sides of this contentious topic which will be discussed in detail, followed by my on take on the matter.
On the one side, there are those reasoning that up-gradation of machines in any company will definitely enhance the efficiency and productivity in the organization and therefore any development in this respect will obviously reduce the time pressure and anxiety from the workers of the company, working on a particular workstation. This is amply illustrated by the fact that accuracy and performance levels of the staff member will be increase to an upper stage if modern machinery will be introduced in the organization. Moreover, another justification is that this adaptation will also provide convenience to workers, which will automatically help them to accomplish their task effectively and without any stress.
On the other hand, an opposing view asserts that it is quite difficult for the laborers to work with the fast pace of these state-of-the-art computer aided machines. They may easily get exhausted while working with the speed of these software controlled mechanism, which may result in bad health or less productiveness of the person operating them. Take computerized knitting machines for example, which require constant attention of the operator for continuous production of the fabric and workers operating them get easily tired even after a 8 hour work-shift. In addition, if there is any breakage to the equipment, it may also stop the manufacturing process, which could result in a great loss to both the company and the person working on it.
To conclude there are valid arguments on both sides of the controversy; on balance, it is my firm conviction that undoubtedly, improved technology has provided immense benefits to the working society whether there are some certain drawbacks associated with the installation of high-tech machines for people working with them
Whilst  
some
 member of the society underscore the importance of technological advanced equipment for increasing  
working
 standards of employees on their workplace, others advocates that introducing these high-tech  
machines
 have no convenience to  
workers
. There are rational arguments on both sides of this contentious topic which will  
be discussed
 in detail, followed by my on take on the matter.
On the one side, there are those reasoning that up-gradation of  
machines
 in any  
company
 will definitely enhance the efficiency and productivity in the organization and  
therefore
 any development in this respect will  
obviously
  reduce
 the time pressure and anxiety from the  
workers
 of the  
company
,  
working
 on a particular workstation. This is  
amply
 illustrated by the fact that accuracy and performance levels of the staff member will be increase to an upper stage if modern machinery will  
be introduced
 in the organization.  
Moreover
, another justification is that this adaptation will  
also
 provide convenience to  
workers
, which will  
automatically
  help
 them to accomplish their task  
effectively
 and without any  
stress
. 
On the other hand
, an opposing view asserts that it is quite difficult for the laborers to work with the  
fast
 pace of these state-of-the-art computer aided  
machines
. They may  
easily
  get
 exhausted while  
working
 with the speed of  
these software
 controlled mechanism, which may result in  
bad
 health or less productiveness of the person operating them. Take computerized knitting  
machines
  for example
, which require constant attention of the operator for continuous production of the fabric and  
workers
 operating them  
get
  easily
 tired even after  
a
 8 hour work-shift.  
In addition
, if there is any breakage to the equipment, it may  
also
  stop
 the manufacturing process, which could result in a great loss to both the  
company
 and the person  
working
 on it. 
To conclude
 there are valid arguments on both sides of the controversy; on balance, it is my firm conviction that  
undoubtedly
,  
improved
 technology has provided immense benefits to the  
working
 society whether there are  
some
 certain drawbacks associated with the installation of high-tech  
machines
 for  
people
  working
 with them