Nowadays, many hold the view that higher education should focus on helping graduates land better jobs. However, there is a body of opinion which claims that university should care about graduates and the society. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the debate and give my opinion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that university education which concentrates on college students’ employment could improve working condition. Because the university puts most of the effort on helping college students find a better position, they may set loads of professional courses that are specially designed for looking for jobs, which could train graduates’ employable skills. For example, some universities in China set all the courses for teaching specific working knowledge in order that students could have better job opportunities.
On the other hand, nonetheless, higher education that aims for a whole improve of students and society is beneficial to socialization. This is because the activities organised by students union or some other clubs in these colleges could provide students with chances to know each other, becoming friends by frequency activities. Furthermore, universities put graduates and society into consideration would foster students’ interest. To be specific, the optional courses set by the school give students a chance to learn more about their favourite areas, making them enjoy the teaching and become more interested in these things.
To summarise, there is no doubt that higher education which aims at graduates’ employment could help improve the employment problems. At the same time, nevertheless, colleges whose purpose is a comprehensive consideration would benefit the relationship between students and the development of students’ interest. In the final analysis, therefore, one can only conclude that comprehensive education is better.
Nowadays,
many hold
the view that higher
education
should focus on helping
graduates
land
better
jobs.
However
, there is a body of opinion which claims that
university
should care about
graduates
and the society. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the debate and give my opinion.
To
begin
with, it is undeniable that
university
education
which concentrates on college
students’
employment could
improve
working condition.
Because
the
university
puts most of the effort on helping college
students
find a
better
position, they may set loads of professional courses that are
specially
designed for looking for jobs, which could train
graduates’
employable
skills
.
For example
,
some
universities
in China set all the courses for teaching specific working knowledge in order that
students
could have
better
job opportunities.
On the other hand
, nonetheless, higher
education
that aims for a whole
improve
of
students
and society is beneficial to socialization. This is
because
the activities
organised
by
students
union or
some
other clubs in these colleges could provide
students
with chances to know each other, becoming friends by frequency activities.
Furthermore
,
universities
put
graduates
and society into consideration would foster
students’
interest. To be specific, the optional courses set by the school give
students
a chance to learn more about their
favourite
areas, making them enjoy the teaching and become more interested in these things.
To
summarise
, there is no doubt that higher
education
which aims at
graduates’
employment could
help
improve
the employment problems. At the same time,
nevertheless
, colleges whose purpose is a comprehensive consideration would benefit the relationship between
students
and the development of
students’
interest. In the final analysis,
therefore
, one can
only
conclude that comprehensive
education
is
better
.