Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Many people believe that the icreased presence of violence in flms and television thesed ays is resposible for the rising incidents of violent crimes among youth in society. They argue that governments have a duty to control the media so as to reduce this v.2

Many people believe that the icreased presence of violence in flms and television thesed ays is resposible for the rising incidents of violent crimes among youth in society. They argue that governments have a duty to control the media so as to reduce this v. 2
In recent years there has been a rise in violence among young population. Many people believe that it can be connected with the increase of aggressive content shown by the mainstream media. Therefore, some argue that the government should take more control over what is shown on TV. In my opinion, the government is responsible for making people safe and should in fact have control over the TV content. I feel this way for three main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay. Firstly, it has many times been proven that preventing the damage is much more cost effective than dealing with its effects. Censoring TV programs is less expensive than paying for the hospital bills for consequences of violent acts among young adults. For example, when there is a mass school shooting, victims don’t only suffer from physical consequences, but they also suffer emotionally, for which they need an expensive psychological treatment. Considering what was said before, I think that the government should invest its money in certain measures that forbid or at least censor violent and aggressive content on tv. Secondly, numerous experiments done by psychologists and sociologists have shown a connection between long-term exposure to violent content and aggressive behavior in the future. In other words, youth that are often spending their time in front of violent news and movies tend to be more aggressive towards their peers. In fact, one study has shown that children that spend more than four hours per week in front of violent content are displaying more aggressive behavior patterns, compared to their peers who only spend less than two hours. Thirdly, children are the most vulnerable and fragile members of our society and the government has a responsibility to enable them to grow into fully functional and stable adults. More importantly, children’s brains before reaching adulthood are like a sponge, meaning they will soak all around them and take it as a parameter of their future behavior. It is important to mention that countries that had censored their TV program have seen a decrease in violent behavior in youth. It can be concluded that the government should allow censorship over TV programs to prevent violent content being presented, in particular to youth. In my opinion, the reasons why I agree with this statement are: governments’ responsibility for its youth, the benefits of prevention compared to its consequences and finally the numerous experiments showing the positive correlation between aggression in youth and exposure to violence on TV. Compare and contrast your way of your life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying for the next generations? In today’s world things and technology change rapidly and people oftentimes experience many different eras over the course of one lifetime. My generation and the generation of my parents seem so different that one could assume they are hundert years apart. The rise of technology, many human rights movements, much faster way of living - this all happened in just 50 years. In my opinion life in the era of my parents was healthier and more satisfying than life today. This essay will discuss why I think that it is more beneficial for the future generation to experience my parents type of life and not my own. First of all, life in the era of my parents was happening on the streets and in the nature, in contrast to our life in front of the screens today. My parents had more face to face interactions among themselves than we have today. Furthermore, not only did they know their neighbours, but they actually hanged out with them on a daily basis. In the present era, people communicate as well, but more through the screen than in person. For example, when I lived alone, oftentimes I would just type on my computer for few days straight, without real conversation occuring, which at the end made me feel unhappy. And since I value happiness as the most important part of life I think that future generations would be happier in the previous era. Secondly, the era of my parents was much simpler. Those times were mindful and more peaceful, mainly because people didn’t have so many choices as we have today. Contrary to general opinion that more choices equals more satisfaction, studies have shown that it is in fact the opposite. In other words, more opportunities often times mean more stress when making a decision. So I would love the future generations to experience the times when people actually had less choices, but explored them deeper and with more attention and gratification. All this being said, I think that people of the future would benefit much more from the lifestyle my parents had, than from the lifestyle I maintain. To sum up, they wouldn’t be surrounded with computers, but with real people which leads to higher levels of happiness and they would live a simpler and more attentive life than we live today.
In recent years there has been a rise in violence among young population.
Many
people
believe that it can
be connected
with the increase of
aggressive
content
shown by the mainstream media.
Therefore
,
some
argue that the
government
should take more control
over
what
is shown
on TV. In my
opinion
, the
government
is responsible for making
people
safe and should in fact have control
over
the TV
content
. I feel this way for three main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

Firstly
, it has
many
times
been proven
that preventing the damage is
much
more cost effective than dealing with its effects. Censoring TV programs is less expensive than paying for the hospital bills for consequences of
violent
acts among young adults.
For example
, when there is a mass school shooting, victims don’t
only
suffer from physical consequences,
but
they
also
suffer
emotionally
, for which they need an expensive psychological treatment. Considering what
was said
before
, I
think
that the
government
should invest its money in certain measures that forbid or at least censor
violent
and
aggressive
content
on
tv
.

Secondly
, numerous experiments done by psychologists and sociologists have shown a
connection between
long-term exposure to
violent
content
and
aggressive
behavior in the
future
.
In other words
,
youth
that are
often
spending their
time
in front of
violent
news and movies tend to be more
aggressive
towards their peers. In fact, one study has shown that children that spend more than four hours per week in front of
violent
content
are displaying more
aggressive
behavior patterns, compared to their peers who
only
spend less than two hours.

Thirdly
, children are the most vulnerable and fragile members of our society and the
government
has a responsibility to enable them to grow into
fully
functional and stable adults.

More
importantly
, children’s brains
before
reaching adulthood are like a sponge, meaning they will soak all around them and take it as a parameter of their
future
behavior.

It is
important
to mention that countries that had censored their TV program have
seen
a decrease in
violent
behavior in youth.

It can
be concluded
that the
government
should
allow
censorship
over
TV programs to
prevent
violent
content
being presented
,
in particular
to
youth
. In my
opinion
, the reasons why I
agree
with this statement are:
governments’
responsibility for its
youth
, the benefits of prevention compared to its consequences and
finally
the numerous experiments showing the
positive
correlation between aggression in
youth
and exposure to violence on TV.

Compare and contrast your way of your
life
with that of your
parents
. Which way of
life
do you
think
would be more satisfying for the
next
generations?

In
today’s
world things and technology
change
rapidly
and
people
oftentimes experience
many
different
eras
over
the course of one lifetime. My generation and the generation of my
parents
seem
so
different
that one could assume they are
hundert
years apart. The rise of technology,
many
human rights movements,
much
faster way of living
-
this all happened in
just
50 years. In my
opinion
life
in the
era
of my
parents
was healthier and more satisfying than
life
today
.

This essay will discuss why I
think
that it is more beneficial for the
future
generation to experience my
parents
type of
life
and not my
own
.

First of all
,
life
in the
era
of my
parents
was happening on the streets and in the nature,
in contrast
to our
life
in front of the screens
today
. My
parents
had more face to face interactions among themselves than we have
today
.
Furthermore
, not
only
did they know their
neighbours
,
but
they actually hanged out with them on a daily basis. In the present
era
,
people
communicate
as well
,
but
more through the screen than in person.
For example
, when I
lived
alone, oftentimes I would
just
type on my computer for few days straight, without real conversation
occuring
, which at the
end
made me feel unhappy. And since I value happiness as the most
important
part of
life
I
think
that
future
generations would be happier in the previous era.

Secondly
, the
era
of my
parents
was
much
simpler. Those
times
were mindful and more peaceful,
mainly
because
people
didn’t have
so
many
choices as we have
today
. Contrary to general
opinion
that more choices equals more satisfaction, studies have shown that it is in fact the opposite.
In other words
, more opportunities
often
times
mean more
stress
when making a decision.
So
I would
love
the
future
generations to experience the
times
when
people
actually had
less
choices,
but
explored them deeper and with more attention and gratification.

All this
being said
, I
think
that
people
of the
future
would benefit
much
more from the lifestyle my
parents
had, than from the lifestyle I maintain. To sum up, they wouldn’t
be surrounded
with computers,
but
with real
people
which leads to higher levels of
happiness and
they would
live
a simpler and more attentive
life
than we
live
today
.
26Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
91Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
9Mistakes
Learn a new language and get a new soul.
Czech Proverb

IELTS essay Many people believe that the icreased presence of violence in flms and television thesed ays is resposible for the rising incidents of violent crimes among youth in society. They argue that governments have a duty to control the media so as to reduce this v. 2

Essay
  American English
13 paragraphs
835 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts