Many people are of the opinion that media broadcast of famous people is having an adverse effect on youngsters. I strongly believe that media coverage of celebrities has a detrimental effect on children because it consumes their time, although we cannot overlook how they benefit from the inspiration.
On the one hand, the effect that media coverage of celebrities has had on children can be seen as negative. Because there is massive showcase of these people, children tend to spend more time on the internet catching up on the latest celebrity news rather than than using that time for academic research. As a result, they perform dismally in their studies. In Canada, most primary school children obtain lower grades because they spend more time watching celebrity channels on tv such as the famous Kim Kardashian show. Furthermore, children are initiated into bad practices when they are exposed to media that broadcasts celebrities. This is because some famous people are bad role models as they are into dangerous activities involving drugs. As a result, youngsters will imitate their favorite celebrities’ lifestyles which will leave them in serious trouble.
On the other hand, media broadcast of celebrities has clear advantages to young people. Firstly, as children follow celebrities on social media such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, they are motivated to study extremely hard to be successful in life. In other words, famous people act as role models for the young generation. For example, 75% of Michelle Obama’s followers on Twitter are young children and a survey conducted revealed that children follow her because she is an inspiration to them. Secondly, young children can learn about other cultures and new languages when they listen to celebrities on podcasts during their spare time.
In conclusion, although young people are negatively affected by the wide media coverage of famous people, i strongly believe there are benefits associated with it.
Many
people
are of the opinion that
media
broadcast of
famous
people
is having an adverse effect on youngsters. I
strongly
believe that
media
coverage of
celebrities
has a detrimental effect on
children
because
it consumes their
time
, although we cannot overlook how they benefit from the inspiration.
On the one hand, the effect that
media
coverage of
celebrities
has had on
children
can be
seen
as
negative
.
Because
there is massive showcase of these
people
,
children
tend to spend more
time
on the internet catching up on the latest
celebrity
news
rather
than than
using that
time
for academic research.
As a result
, they perform
dismally
in their studies. In Canada, most primary school
children
obtain lower grades
because
they spend more
time
watching
celebrity
channels on
tv
such as the
famous
Kim Kardashian
show
.
Furthermore
,
children
are initiated
into
bad
practices when they
are exposed
to
media
that broadcasts
celebrities
. This is
because
some
famous
people
are
bad
role models as they are into
dangerous
activities involving drugs.
As a result
, youngsters will imitate their favorite
celebrities’
lifestyles which will
leave
them in serious trouble.
On the other hand
,
media
broadcast of
celebrities
has
clear
advantages to
young
people
.
Firstly
, as
children
follow
celebrities
on social
media
such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, they
are motivated
to study
extremely
hard
to be successful in life.
In other words
,
famous
people
act as role models for the
young
generation.
For example
, 75% of Michelle Obama’s followers on Twitter are
young
children
and a survey conducted revealed that
children
follow her
because
she is an inspiration to them.
Secondly
,
young
children
can learn about other cultures and new languages when they listen to
celebrities
on podcasts during their spare time.
In conclusion
, although
young
people
are
negatively
affected
by the wide
media
coverage of
famous
people
,
i
strongly
believe there are benefits associated with it.
14Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
47Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes