Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Many people believe that in order to have clean and tidy streets in their neighborhood, this should be the residents’ responsibility; while others think it should be the government’s duty. What is your opinion? v.2

Many people believe that in order to have clean and tidy streets in their neighborhood, this should be the residents’ responsibility; while others think it should be the government’s duty. What is your opinion? v. 2
In today’s world, animal testing is commonly used to enhance new treatments and to test the safety of other products. There has been a difference of opinion regarding the topic that a plethora of individuals opines that these tests ought to be prohibited since animals can suffer from these experiments; however, an overwhelming majority of people deem that animals should be used because of their merits to humanity. On the one hand, I realized why some people support the opinion that animals should be used these experiments. The proponents of the notion supply a variety of points to elaborate their standpoint. First and foremost, the major benefit of animal testing is that researchers can aided by these experiments in finding drugs and treatments to progress health and medicine. To be more specific, a number of animals may react the same way as humans do to a great number of diseases; therefore, it assists scientists to find the core of the illness at the same time as it can help improve medicine. The second point to note is that animal testing helps in figuring out the safety of drugs on people. For instance, according the researchers of Harvard University approximately 99% of human genes can be the same with humans, due to the fact that scientists can easily check the quality and safety of drugs. Nevertheless, I would side with those who argue that animal testing should be restricted. The primary reason why I think that these experiments ought to be forbidden is because a vast majority of animals could kill these tests. In other words, if these chemical substances could not be successful, numerous animals may lose their abilities and die. Furthermore, animals and humans’ DNA could not be same, which means that they should not react as people’s bodies, so these tests are unreliable. Moreover, animal testing is unreasonably expensive. This is because animals are purchased, growth, fed, housed and carried, which takes up so much time and prices. By way of conclusion, there are certain justification for the former statement, albeit I am of the opinion that animal testing should be restricted. I recommend that researchers should not use animals for testing.
In
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
’s world,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is
commonly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to enhance new treatments and to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
test
the safety of other products. There has been a difference of opinion regarding the topic that a plethora of individuals opines that these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
ought to
be prohibited
since
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
can suffer from these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
;
however
, an overwhelming majority of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
deem that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of their merits to humanity.

On the one hand, I realized why
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
support the opinion that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
. The proponents of the notion supply a variety of points to elaborate their standpoint.
First
and foremost, the major benefit of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is that researchers can aided by these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
in finding drugs and treatments to progress health and medicine. To be more specific, a number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
may react the same way as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
do to a great number of diseases;
therefore
, it assists scientists to find the core of the illness at the same time as it can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
medicine. The second point to note is that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
in figuring out the safety of drugs on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
.
For instance
, according the researchers of Harvard University approximately 99% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
genes can be the same with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
, due to the fact that scientists can
easily
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
check
the quality and safety of drugs.

Nevertheless
, I would side with those who argue that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
should
be restricted
. The primary reason why I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
ought to
be forbidden
is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
a vast majority of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
could kill these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
.
In other words
, if these chemical substances could not be successful, numerous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
may lose their abilities and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
die
.
Furthermore
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans’
DNA could not be same, which means that they should not react as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people’s
bodies,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
are unreliable.
Moreover
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is
unreasonably
expensive. This is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
purchased
, growth, fed, housed and carried, which takes up
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
much time and prices.

By way of conclusion, there are certain justification for the former statement, albeit I am of the opinion that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
should
be restricted
. I recommend that researchers should not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes
To have another language is to possess a second soul.
Charlemagne

IELTS essay Many people believe that in order to have clean and tidy streets in their neighborhood, this should be the residents’ responsibility; while others think it should be the government’s duty. What is your opinion? v. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
364 words
8.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts