It is believed that in some nations owing to have guns by individuals results in an increase in the number of shootings. I agree with this notion to a large extent as this is worrying problem that looks set to continue.
To begin with, issuing weapons by legal authorities such as guns to the army officers, civil officers, celebrities, affluent class is for the sake of their protection at home or any unplanned social events. This is because it makes them feel more secure and ready to tackle any danger such as terror activities. For instance, if any well-known businessman travels with valuable documents in order to fix important business deal, it would be helpful for him to have guns for his safety. Therefore, having arms sometimes make individual life safer and easier.
Even though it makes some people safe, the cumulative increase in sum of guns would proportionately increase a statistic of shootings in society. It is generally seen that aggression makes one oblivious about wrong and right decisions which leads to many unpremeditated crimes. For instance, The International Crime Bureau recently revealed statistics showing that more than 50% shooting by the private gun owner had done in the urge of getting revenge as a heat of the moment. Apart from this, many times guns at homes are accessed by teenagers for the urge of knowing how it works in the absence of their possessors and mistakenly it could cause serious happenings. Hence, it shows that easily accessible guns making shooting more common.
To recapitulate, although having guns made a segment of society protected, rise in the number of guns possesses has been widening the shooting rate in terms of reacting in short temper and using improperly by teenagers.
It
is believed
that in
some
nations owing to have
guns
by individuals results in an increase in the number of
shootings
. I
agree
with this notion to a large extent as this is worrying problem that looks set to continue.
To
begin
with, issuing weapons by legal authorities such as
guns
to the army officers, civil officers, celebrities, affluent
class
is for the sake of their protection at home or any unplanned social
events
. This is
because
it
makes
them feel more secure and ready to tackle any
danger
such as terror activities.
For instance
, if any well-known businessman travels with valuable documents in order to
fix
important
business deal, it would be helpful for him to have
guns
for his safety.
Therefore
, having arms
sometimes
make
individual life safer and easier.
Even though
it
makes
some
people
safe, the cumulative increase in sum of
guns
would
proportionately
increase a statistic of
shootings
in society. It is
generally
seen
that aggression
makes
one oblivious about
wrong
and right decisions which leads to
many
unpremeditated crimes.
For instance
, The International Crime Bureau recently revealed statistics showing that more than 50%
shooting
by the private
gun
owner had done in the urge of getting revenge as a heat of the moment. Apart from this,
many
times
guns
at homes
are accessed
by
teenagers
for the urge of knowing how it works in the absence of their possessors and
mistakenly
it could cause serious happenings.
Hence
, it
shows
that
easily
accessible
guns
making
shooting
more common.
To recapitulate, although having
guns
made a segment of society protected, rise in the number of
guns
possesses has been widening the
shooting
rate in terms of reacting in short temper and using
improperly
by
teenagers
.