In the modern world, many governmental organizations, especially executive branch is willing to control the social sites users in order to provide safety and prevent cybercrime on the net. However, there are certain disadvantages of these initiatives, such as breaking the human rights and freedom of speech. Personally, I believe that social networking sites should be out of the government interventions.
On the one hand, some administrative workers and government officials can use personal dates of the network users for their own purposes. Money laundering and corruption rate may be increased because of stealing the personal dates. Moreover, government can block the internet. For example, during the demonstration in the last summer in Kazakhstan, some certain YouTube channels were blocked by the authorities, and these actions make society more irritated, leading to further rallies in the future.
On the other hand, it is true that the administration can provide safety for internet users. In this regard, they can filter some resources. For example, some sites on the network may trick users, and authorized bodies can block them. Moreover, it is clear that online crime is high in some countries, because of inadequate systems of cyber security, leading to losing money and dates.
In this regard, some people believe that there should be administrative control over the users.
In conclusion, although competent authorities can reduce the level of cybercrime, it can be manageable though the controlling the internet, leading to stealing personal dates. In addition to this, it can be utilized in the political sphere too.
In the modern world,
many
governmental organizations,
especially
executive branch is willing to control the social sites
users
in order to provide safety and
prevent
cybercrime on the net.
However
, there are certain disadvantages of these initiatives, such as breaking the human rights and freedom of speech.
Personally
, I believe that social networking sites should be out of the
government
interventions.
On the one hand,
some
administrative workers and
government
officials can
use
personal dates of the network
users
for their
own
purposes. Money laundering and corruption rate may
be increased
because
of stealing the personal dates.
Moreover
,
government
can block the internet.
For example
, during the demonstration in the last summer in Kazakhstan,
some
certain YouTube channels
were blocked
by the authorities, and these actions
make
society more irritated, leading to
further
rallies in the future.
On the other hand
, it is true that the administration can provide safety for internet
users
. In this regard, they can filter
some
resources.
For example
,
some
sites on the network may trick
users
, and authorized bodies can block them.
Moreover
, it is
clear
that online crime is high in
some
countries,
because
of inadequate systems of cyber security, leading to losing money and dates.
In this regard,
some
people
believe that there should be administrative control over the users.
In conclusion
, although competent authorities can
reduce
the level of cybercrime, it can be manageable though the controlling the internet, leading to stealing personal dates.
In
addition to this, it can
be utilized
in the political sphere too.