It is true that several governments regard economic progress as the most critical achievement of a country. However, others believe that there are alternative aspects in the society that should be concerned. In my opinion, I support both claims as each has its own reasons.
To begin with, it is undeniable that a country with a vigorous economy status would reflect the prosperity as well as bring better facilities for that nation. Firstly, when the economy development is put as top-priority, there would be more jobs for inhabitants with better salaries. Thus, it definitely might address the high rate of unemployment in many developing and undeveloped countries. Moreover, strong finance ability could help a country have a stable stand in the globe stage, therefore, influence more on politics and trading. Secondly, the authorities would have more funds to invest on infrastructure and public services, which might improve the standard of living. For example, more schools and hospitals are built, thereby education and healthcare will be emphasized.
On the other hand, economy is not the only element contributing to the thriving of a country. Other aspects are human rights, equality or happiness, which have crucial impact on millions of residents. It is a moral treatment that governments help the minority groups, for instance subsidize poor children in terms of education and open vocational courses for people in rural areas that could not seek a job. As a result, residents would feel the warm attention from the competent authorities towards them. Furthermore, a thriving country should focus on the environmental sustainability. As the economy grows fast, more industrial complexes are constructed, thus release large amount of untreated garbage as well as hazardous gas into the surroundings. In the long term, this probably would adversely affect health and more epidemic diseases would appear.
By way of conclusion, it is crystal-clear that economic progress is extremely vital to a country, yet it is not the main field to focus on. From my point of view, it is better to develop all aspects in one time.
It is true that several
governments
regard economic progress as the most critical achievement of a
country
.
However
, others believe that there are alternative aspects in the society that should
be concerned
. In my opinion, I support both claims as each has its
own
reasons.
To
begin
with, it is undeniable that a
country
with a vigorous
economy
status would reflect the prosperity
as well
as bring better facilities for that nation.
Firstly
, when the
economy
development
is put
as top-priority, there would be more jobs for inhabitants with better salaries.
Thus
, it definitely might address the high rate of unemployment in
many
developing and undeveloped
countries
.
Moreover
, strong finance ability could
help
a
country
have a stable stand in the globe stage,
therefore
, influence more on politics and trading.
Secondly
, the authorities would have more funds to invest on infrastructure and public services, which might
improve
the standard of living.
For example
, more schools and hospitals
are built
, thereby education and healthcare will
be emphasized
.
On the other hand
,
economy
is not the
only
element contributing to the thriving of a
country
. Other aspects are human rights, equality or happiness, which have crucial impact on millions of residents. It is a moral treatment that
governments
help
the minority groups,
for instance
subsidize poor children in terms of education and open vocational courses for
people
in rural areas that could not seek a job.
As a result
, residents would feel the warm attention from the competent authorities towards them.
Furthermore
, a thriving
country
should focus on the environmental sustainability. As the
economy
grows
fast
, more industrial complexes
are constructed
,
thus
release large amount of untreated garbage
as well
as hazardous gas into the surroundings. In the long term, this
probably
would
adversely
affect health and more epidemic diseases would appear.
By way of conclusion, it is crystal-
clear
that economic progress is
extremely
vital to a
country
,
yet
it is not the main field to focus on. From my point of view, it is better to develop all aspects in one time.