Environment problems are multi-faced. Placing the management of these issues on one particular company will be a burden on it in many respects. This essay will prove why this problem should be handled by multiple organizations for a better result.
Handling multiple pollution issues concerning air, water and earth is a burden in many respects on an organization. Firstly, the vastness of the geographical area itself will make it impossible to be managed single handed. Secondly, like the world is multi-cultured the problem faced by each country are different from others. For instance, as per the report published by an NGO, the third world countries face problems which are totally different from that of developed countries. So, managing environmental problems based on physical territory of a nation will be a better idea to avoid clashes including emotional.
On the other hand, if these problems are handled by organizations on country wise, locally sensitive issues can be taken care more effectively as they are aware of the way of life in a better way. To be more specific, in a country like India, local tribes living near forest depend on forest for firewood which is a banned practice in many developed countries. Another controversial issue is the argument over hole in the ozone layer, where the concern is for top industrialized nations. So these two contradictions really prove that localized management will be a better idea.
To summarize, I agree with the fact that the environmental issue is a global problem and should be dealt in a global scale. But one organization handling it will be less effective and can get in to controversies when dealing with sensitive local issues. So, global effort with local participation will be the best solution.
Environment
problems
are multi-faced. Placing the management of these
issues
on one particular
company
will be a burden on it in
many
respects. This essay will prove why this
problem
should
be handled
by multiple
organizations
for a
better
result.
Handling multiple pollution
issues
concerning air, water and earth is a burden in
many
respects on an
organization
.
Firstly
, the vastness of the geographical area itself will
make
it impossible to
be managed
single handed
.
Secondly
, like the world is multi-cultured the
problem
faced by each
country
are
different
from others.
For instance
, as per the report published by an NGO, the third world
countries
face
problems
which are
totally
different
from that of developed
countries
.
So
, managing environmental
problems
based on physical territory of a nation will be a
better
idea
to avoid clashes including emotional.
On the other hand
, if these
problems
are handled
by
organizations
on
country
wise,
locally
sensitive
issues
can
be taken
care more
effectively
as they are aware of the way of life in a
better
way. To be more specific, in a
country
like India, local tribes living near forest depend on forest for firewood which is a banned practice in
many
developed
countries
. Another controversial
issue
is the argument over hole in the ozone layer, where the concern is for top industrialized nations.
So
these two contradictions
really
prove that localized management will be a
better
idea
.
To summarize
, I
agree with the fact that
the environmental
issue
is a global
problem
and should
be dealt
in a global scale.
But
one
organization
handling it will be less effective and can
get
in to controversies when dealing with sensitive local
issues
.
So
, global effort with local participation will be the best solution.
5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
27Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes