Maintaining public libraries will waste money due to the same function from computer technologies to get information, but the other argues that this can help some region in the rural area.
Wasting money for maintaining of public libraries has no benefit due to the computer technologies having same function, leading to lack of focus on the other aspects. This is because the authority maintain public libraries being assests due to a plethora information from those, whereas people can get many information from the Internet without they have to go to libraries. According to the CNN news, authority in Jakarta spend 100 millions to repair public libraries in there, but 85% students in there obtain their information regarding their homework from the school, gaining from the Internet because they can get various information everytime and everywhere they want, but if they want to search in the libraries they have to make some regulations with borrowing that books.
However, despite computer technologies have the same function, but also these can help people to use the technologies, increasing their knowledge. It is because that countryside lacks of the Internet, so the government has to decide devoloping good facilities in the libraries. For instance, in Papua Indonesia, there are so difficult to gain the network so the Internet is so hard in there. The authorities in there deciding to waste money around 50 million to maintain the computer or the other books in the libraries, resulting children in there have to motivate learning with new items.
In conclusion, getting information can gain in the public libraries with the computer technologies, while spending much money is one of the risk to do that. Can government make balance from these?
Maintaining
public
libraries will waste
money
due to the same function from computer
technologies
to
get
information
,
but
the other argues that this can
help
some
region in the rural area.
Wasting
money
for maintaining of
public
libraries has no benefit due to the computer
technologies
having same function, leading to lack of focus on the other aspects. This is
because
the authority maintain
public
libraries being
assests
due to a plethora
information
from those, whereas
people
can
get
many
information
from the Internet without they
have to
go to libraries. According to the CNN news, authority in Jakarta spend 100 millions to repair
public
libraries in there,
but
85% students in there obtain their
information
regarding their homework from the school, gaining from the Internet
because
they can
get
various
information
everytime
and everywhere they want,
but
if they want to search in the libraries they
have to
make
some
regulations with borrowing that books.
However
, despite computer
technologies
have the same function,
but
also
these can
help
people
to
use
the
technologies
, increasing their knowledge. It is
because
that countryside lacks of the Internet,
so
the
government
has to
decide
devoloping
good
facilities in the libraries.
For instance
, in
Papua
Indonesia, there are
so
difficult to gain the network
so
the Internet is
so
hard
in there. The authorities in there deciding to waste
money
around 50 million to maintain the computer or the other books in the libraries, resulting children in there
have to
motivate learning with new items.
In conclusion
, getting
information
can gain in the
public
libraries with the computer
technologies
, while spending much
money
is one of the
risk
to do that. Can
government
make
balance from these?