It is true that environmental pollution is a major topic of concern. Although I accept that limit long-distant flights could help this situation, I do not agree that it is the only measure that the government should take.
It is acknowledged that flight restriction may help to reduce both the consumption of the traditional natural resources and the amount of carbon dioxide released into the air. This contributes greatly to improving the air quality and preventing people from some serious health problems such as lung cancer and asthma. However, I believe this solution is completely necessary, and it has more drawbacks than benefits. Normally, limiting the use of long-distant flights may hold tourism industry back from the development, causing a significant rise in unemployment rate. Also, discouraging tourist air travel may restrict the choice of visitors to distant places. For example, without traveling by airplane, it is hard for Vietnamese people to seek other ways to go to Australia.
However, I believe that the government should do more than simply limit non-essential flights. It might be more effective if the government utilize new sources of energy to replace or to reduce the over-consumption of fossil fuels. This can be done by using environmentally friendly energy sources from solar, wind, and water power. Another remedy they could use would be to encourage citizens to change their traveling habits towards commuting by public transports such as bus and train. For instance, in many countries, students are allowed to use buses and trains free of charge, which reduces the number of private vehicles on streets, leading to a significant reduction in air pollution. Finally, it is necessary for every individual to have an awareness of environmental preservation. People can reduce pollution by conserving energy by turning off lights, computers, air conditioners, and other appliances when not in use.
In conclusion, perhaps limit air travel may solve the problem related to pollution, but this would certainly not be the only way to protect the environment.
It is true that environmental
pollution
is a major topic of concern. Although I accept that limit long-distant
flights
could
help
this situation, I do not
agree
that it is the
only
measure that the
government
should take.
It
is acknowledged
that
flight
restriction may
help
to
reduce
both the consumption of the traditional natural resources and the amount of carbon dioxide released into the
air
. This contributes
greatly
to improving the
air
quality and preventing
people
from
some
serious health problems such as lung cancer and asthma.
However
, I believe this solution is completely necessary, and it has more drawbacks than benefits.
Normally
, limiting the
use
of long-distant
flights
may hold tourism industry back from the development, causing a significant rise in unemployment rate.
Also
, discouraging tourist
air
travel may restrict the choice of visitors to distant places.
For example
, without traveling by airplane, it is
hard
for Vietnamese
people
to seek other ways to go to Australia.
However
, I believe that the
government
should do more than
simply
limit non-essential
flights
. It might be more effective if the
government
utilize new sources of energy to replace or to
reduce
the over-consumption of fossil fuels. This can
be done
by using
environmentally
friendly energy sources from solar, wind, and water power. Another remedy they could
use
would be to encourage citizens to
change
their traveling habits towards commuting by public transports such as bus and train.
For instance
, in
many
countries, students are
allowed
to
use
buses and trains free of charge, which
reduces
the number of private vehicles on streets, leading to a significant reduction in
air
pollution
.
Finally
, it is necessary for every individual to have an awareness of environmental preservation.
People
can
reduce
pollution
by conserving energy by turning off lights, computers,
air
conditioners, and other appliances when not in
use
.
In conclusion
, perhaps limit
air
travel may solve the problem related to
pollution
,
but
this would
certainly
not be the
only
way to protect the environment.