It has been argued that nurturing dogs in urban areas is unsuitable. Although allowing dogs to live in their natural habitats is beneficial to some extent, it is better to raise dogs in metropolitan areas.
On the one hand, letting dogs live in their wildlife exerts potential significant impacts on both dogs and human beings. In fact, in their natural environment, dogs follow and develop their instincts - such as a keen sense of smell - to catch prey. This helps them be more physically active and generally healthy compared to domestication ones. In addition, because their ancestor is a wild animal, they sometimes inevitably bring possible hazards to humans, especially young kids. For example, in Vietnam, eating a bite of chocolate, one family dog became unexpectedly crazy and bit a newborn, which caused that infant’s painful death.
On the other hand, there are some reasons why nurturing dogs in inner-city areas is more beneficial. The first reason is that there are lots of vulnerable and disabled dogs, which cannot compete with other predators to survive in such an extreme environment. This makes sustainable human feeding and affection become irreplaceable sources of their livings. Another reason is that having dogs as a pet prevents people, particularly those who live in a fast-paced city, from having mental illnesses such as depression or anxiety disorder. According to reliable research at the University of Cambridge, people owning dogs have lower chances of traumatic stress disorder as dogs bring marvellous joy and boundless energy when playing with them.
In conclusion, despite the advantages of having dogs live outside non-urban areas, it is better to keep dogs in a city.
It has
been argued
that nurturing
dogs
in urban areas is unsuitable. Although allowing
dogs
to
live
in their natural habitats is beneficial to
some
extent, it is better to raise
dogs
in metropolitan areas.
On the one hand, letting
dogs
live
in their wildlife exerts potential significant impacts on both
dogs
and human beings. In fact, in their natural environment,
dogs
follow and develop their instincts
-
such as a keen sense of smell
-
to catch prey. This
helps
them be more
physically
active and
generally
healthy compared to domestication ones.
In addition
,
because
their ancestor is a wild animal, they
sometimes
inevitably
bring possible hazards to humans,
especially
young kids.
For example
, in Vietnam, eating a bite of chocolate, one family
dog
became
unexpectedly
crazy and bit a newborn, which caused that infant’s painful death.
On the other hand
, there are
some
reasons why nurturing
dogs
in inner-city areas is more beneficial. The
first
reason is that there are lots of vulnerable and disabled
dogs
, which cannot compete with other predators to survive in such an extreme environment. This
makes
sustainable human feeding and affection become irreplaceable sources of their livings. Another reason is that having
dogs
as a pet
prevents
people
,
particularly
those who
live
in a
fast
-paced city, from having mental illnesses such as depression or anxiety disorder. According to reliable research at the University of Cambridge,
people
owning
dogs
have lower chances of traumatic
stress
disorder as
dogs
bring
marvellous
joy and boundless energy when playing with them.
In conclusion
, despite the advantages of having
dogs
live
outside non-urban areas, it is better to
keep
dogs
in a city.