Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?

It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? v. 1
Off lately, a lot of debate has gone into the monetary expenses of the government for wildlife protection instead of other important problems such as encouraging education among students of lower economic strata. Although it is important to protect vulnerable species, I believe dedicating financial resources to educating kids from poor economic areas would be beneficial. With the government investing in projects aiming for preservation of the biodiversity, it ensures the safety of the species from harm. The formulation of stringent policies prohibiting heinous acts such as poaching and hunting has led to a decrease in animal killings. Implementing better means to deal with water pollution like preventing the disposal of plastics has led to fewer people polluting them with plastics. Even though a lot of finances have been dedicated to protecting wildlife, no significant results have been observed in the ecosystem. Most of the organisms that were vulnerable, either continue to be vulnerable or have become extinct. With a sharp increase in juvenile crime rates, it is imperative to direct financial aid in motivating and helping more students gain access to schools. Most adolescents drop out of school either due to lack of funds or lack of motivation. Directing resources to these young and sharp minds in the form of scholarships or in-school activities would encourage them to perform better and raise their standard of living. For example, a survey conducted by the USA government revealed that teenagers from low-lying areas with access to government scholarships performed much better than regular students. Therefore, investing in the young minds of a nation would help in creating a better and safe community. To conclude, even though a fair amount of money has been invested in protecting wildlife but it hasn’t revealed significant improvements. However, investing in educating young adults from economically weaker backgrounds would reap benefits to society.
Off lately,
a lot of
debate has gone into the monetary expenses of the
government
for wildlife protection
instead
of other
important
problems such as encouraging education among students of lower economic strata. Although it is
important
to protect vulnerable species, I believe dedicating financial resources to educating kids from poor economic areas would be beneficial.

With the
government
investing in projects aiming for preservation of the biodiversity, it ensures the safety of the species from harm. The formulation of stringent policies prohibiting heinous acts such as poaching and hunting has led to a decrease in animal killings. Implementing
better
means to deal with water pollution like preventing the disposal of plastics has led to fewer
people
polluting them with plastics.
Even though
a lot of
finances have
been dedicated
to protecting wildlife, no significant results have
been observed
in the ecosystem. Most of the organisms that were vulnerable, either continue to be vulnerable or have become extinct.

With a sharp increase in juvenile crime rates, it is imperative to direct financial aid in motivating and helping more students gain access to schools. Most adolescents drop out of school either due to lack of funds or lack of motivation. Directing resources to these young and sharp minds in the form of scholarships or in-school activities would encourage them to perform
better
and raise their standard of living.
For example
, a survey conducted by the USA
government
revealed that
teenagers
from low-lying areas with access to
government
scholarships performed much
better
than regular students.
Therefore
, investing in the young minds of a nation would
help
in creating a
better
and safe community.

To conclude
,
even though
a
fair
amount of money has
been invested
in protecting wildlife
but
it hasn’t revealed significant improvements.
However
, investing in educating young adults from
economically
weaker backgrounds would reap benefits to society.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad
Show Comments
A new language is a new life.
Persian Proverb

IELTS essay It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
307 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts