Furnishing younger generations with tertiary education play an indispensable part in the government’s policies. However, most policy makers reckon that it is infeasible and inefficient to offer the vast majority of the youth higher education. From my perspective, I completely agree with this statement for the following reasons.
It proves impossible for a country to provide entry to tertiary education for all young people. The first reason is the prohibitive tuition fees and the inability to afford them of the majority of youths. College or university undergraduates are supposed to learn from experiments, purchase costly materials during a term, let alone other field trips if one major in practical fields of study like engineering or medicine. All of these plus the fact that many students from rural areas find it tough to meet only the annual tuition fees, especially in poverty-stricken countries. This leads to the second reason in which I mean government have other priorities such as universal education, healthcare system to invest in.
It also does not seem useful for the whole country once the state wish to accommodate the youth with higher degrees. This is primarily because there is no guarantee that students will become successful and contribute to the well-being of their nation after finishing their study. There are the cases when distinguished graduates fail to secure a decent job and thus become unemployed, exacerbating the burden on society as a consequence. Even worse, some are likely to slack off with their studies or even drop out of school as they either take higher study for granted or find no motivation in furthering their knowledge, given the thought that tertiary education is subsidized or free of charge.
In conclusion, it’s my firm belief that not only it is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people
Furnishing younger generations with tertiary
education
play an indispensable part in the
government
’s policies.
However
, most
policy makers
reckon that it is infeasible and inefficient to offer the vast majority of the youth higher
education
. From my perspective, I completely
agree
with this statement for the following reasons.
It proves impossible for a
country
to provide entry to tertiary
education
for all young
people
. The
first
reason is the prohibitive tuition fees and the inability to afford them of the majority of youths. College or university undergraduates
are supposed
to learn from experiments,
purchase
costly materials during a term,
let
alone other field trips if one major in practical fields of
study
like engineering or medicine. All of these plus the fact that
many
students from rural areas find it tough to
meet
only
the annual tuition fees,
especially
in poverty-stricken
countries
. This leads to the second reason in which I mean
government
have other priorities such as universal
education
, healthcare system to invest in.
It
also
does not seem useful for the whole
country
once the state wish to accommodate the youth with higher degrees. This is
primarily
because
there is no guarantee that students will become successful and contribute to the well-being of their nation after finishing their
study
. There are the cases when distinguished graduates fail to secure a decent job and
thus
become unemployed, exacerbating the burden on society as a consequence. Even worse,
some
are likely to slack off with their
studies
or even drop out of school as they either take higher
study
for granted or find no motivation in furthering their knowledge,
given
the
thought
that tertiary
education
is subsidized
or free of charge.
In conclusion
, it’s my firm belief that not
only
it is neither possible nor useful for a
country
to provide university places for a high proportion of young
people