It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these vie v.13
It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. 13
Nowadays, the relative importance of natural talent and training is a frequent and popular topic of debates, where people discuss the various levels of abilities in sport, art, or music.
It is obvious, that education systems are based on belief than children can effectively be taught to acquire different skills, including those associated with sport, art, and music. So from our own school experience, we can find plenty evidence to support this thought, that any children can acquire these skills with continued training and practice.
However, some people believe that innate talent is more essential factor that continued teaching. They think, that this differentiates talented people from those who has been trained to play sport or an instrument. In other words, there is more skill than a teaching technique, and this extra talent can not be taught, no matter how good the teacher an practices.
My opinion is that some people have talents that are undoubtedly inherited via their genes. Such talent give individuals a facility for certain skills that allow them to excel, whereas others are more hard-working students, nevertheless they never manage to reach a comparable level. But, as with all questions of nature versus nurture, they are not mutually exclusive. Good musicians or artist have probably succeed because of both good training and innate talent. Without the natural talent, continuous training would be neither attractive nor productive, and without the training, people cannot improve and develop their talent.
In conclusion, I agree that any child can be taught particular skills, but to be a be a real professional and good in areas such as music, art, or sport, then some natural talent is required.
Nowadays, the relative importance of natural
talent
and
training
is a frequent and popular topic of debates, where
people
discuss the various levels of abilities in
sport
, art, or music.
It is obvious, that education systems
are based
on belief than children can
effectively
be taught
to acquire
different
skills
, including those associated with
sport
, art, and music.
So
from our
own
school experience, we can find
plenty
evidence to support this
thought
, that any children can acquire these
skills
with continued
training
and practice.
However
,
some
people
believe that innate
talent
is more essential factor that continued teaching. They
think
, that this differentiates talented
people
from those who has
been trained
to play
sport
or an instrument.
In other words
, there is more
skill
than a teaching technique, and this extra
talent
can not
be taught
, no matter how
good
the teacher
an practices
.
My opinion is that
some
people
have
talents
that are
undoubtedly
inherited via their genes. Such
talent
give individuals a facility for certain
skills
that
allow
them to excel, whereas others are more
hard
-working students,
nevertheless
they never manage to reach a comparable level.
But
, as with all questions of nature versus nurture, they are not
mutually
exclusive.
Good
musicians or artist have
probably
succeed
because
of both
good
training
and innate
talent
. Without the natural
talent
, continuous
training
would be neither attractive nor productive, and without the
training
,
people
cannot
improve
and develop their talent.
In conclusion
, I
agree
that any child can
be taught
particular
skills
,
but
to
be a be a
real professional and
good
in areas such as music, art, or
sport
, then
some
natural
talent
is required
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
31Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes