It is often considered by some that, there were not much importance of the Olympic games in this century. However, in this essay fairly disagree with the statement because, sports events had a vivid place in peoples mind and the nations too. It is not a valid reason that the technical improvements and innovative inventions of 21st century replace the value of an international sport event like Olympic traits like enhancement in physical, financial, social, and so on.
The foremost reason for disagreement that, sports events make people's capability of the multitude of talent check up and entertainment activity rather than the materialistic technical items. People who are opposing the Olympic game may be by the effects of games in computer or smartphone video games and so on. Physical thrive in different kinds of sports items often identify the world number one fast tracker, players, and so on. Secondly, Olympic games would broaden the horizon not only the players but also the viewers from various nationalities all over the world. Such attributes would not get through 21 century technological developments. For instance, many people ascertain the knowledge regarding various sports items and the wide range of nationalities presence would be available in one stadium.
Likewise, Olympic games would enhance the financial status of many nations and Olympians. Since, make use of such programs would flourish the economy by tourists, players, delegates and far distant inhabitants of a host country. Despite that, such events may devoid of cultural diversity and enhance the trade and commerce to some extent. Even though, in twenty first century importance of economic development has been inevitable by many aspects.
To sum up, although, there was controversy related to Olympic events, the emerging criteria which people would not get by technology could be achieved by the numerous sports items held on Olympic day. Since, anyone could not suggest to avoid such games.
It is
often
considered by
some
that, there were not much importance of the Olympic
games
in this century.
However
, in this essay
fairly
disagree with the statement
because
,
sports
events
had a vivid place in
peoples
mind and the nations too. It is not a valid reason that the technical improvements and innovative inventions of 21st century replace the value of an international
sport
event
like Olympic traits like enhancement in physical, financial, social, and
so
on.
The foremost reason for disagreement that,
sports
events
make
people
's capability of the multitude of talent
check
up and entertainment activity
rather
than the materialistic technical
items
.
People
who are opposing the Olympic game may be by the effects of
games
in computer or smartphone video
games
and
so
on. Physical thrive in
different
kinds of
sports
items
often
identify the world number one
fast
tracker, players, and
so
on.
Secondly
, Olympic
games
would broaden the horizon not
only
the players
but
also
the viewers from various nationalities all over the world. Such attributes would not
get
through
21 century
technological developments.
For instance
,
many
people
ascertain the knowledge regarding various
sports
items
and the wide range of nationalities presence would be available in one stadium.
Likewise
, Olympic
games
would enhance the financial status of
many
nations and Olympians. Since,
make
use
of such programs would flourish the economy by tourists, players, delegates and far distant inhabitants of a host country. Despite that, such
events
may devoid of cultural diversity and enhance the trade and commerce to
some
extent.
Even though
, in twenty
first
century importance of economic development has been inevitable by
many
aspects.
To sum up, although, there was controversy related to Olympic
events
, the emerging criteria which
people
would not
get
by technology could
be achieved
by the numerous
sports
items
held on Olympic day.
Since
, anyone could not
suggest to avoid
such
games
.