It is argued that it found the travel less and less expensive than in the past, and the governments tend to boost to tourism, especially foreign tourist. Personally, I strongly agree that this trend’s advantages outweigh its disadvantages.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why the authority should propose the tourism policy by lower cost to attract more international visitors. From the perspective of social-economic growth, the more foreign guesses visit the country, the more improvement living standard for localities in particular and nations in general due to creating more jobs for local people and exchanging international currency among countries. For instance, Iceland, in 2015, the growing rate reach at 20% compared to the figure for last year, according to the datas of IMF. Moreover, one of the side effects of attracting more tourist is creating an equal environment for the underprivileged able to broaden their horizons throughout learning identical cultures, instead of the wealthy could afford, in the past.
On the other hand, besides of aforementioned benefits, it also appears many challenges in this trend. In terms of natural resources, catering the needs of a number of international passengers which requires a high standard of infrastructure that so the huge expanding land is one of the prerequisites for construction. As a result, many animals are on the brink of extinction owing to habitat destruction, if not allocating resource rightly. Furthermore, because of the unawareness of environmental protection releasing an amount of garbages to rivers or vendors, plastic bags, cans, papers, namely, which adverse environmental effects on ozone layer depletion and soil degradation.
In conclusion, although it has both countless pros and cons, I suppose it should be less expensive in international travel. However, the authority should take strict measures reducing a negative impact on the environment
It
is argued
that it found the travel less and less expensive than in the past, and the
governments
tend to boost to tourism,
especially
foreign tourist.
Personally
, I
strongly
agree
that this trend’s advantages outweigh its disadvantages.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why the authority should propose the tourism policy by lower cost to attract more
international
visitors. From the perspective of social-economic growth, the more foreign guesses visit the country, the more improvement living standard for localities
in particular
and nations
in general
due to creating more jobs for local
people
and exchanging
international
currency among countries.
For instance
, Iceland, in 2015, the growing rate reach at 20% compared to the figure for last year, according to the
datas
of IMF.
Moreover
, one of the side effects of attracting more tourist is creating an equal environment for the underprivileged able to broaden their horizons throughout learning identical cultures,
instead
of the wealthy could afford, in the past.
On the other hand
,
besides
of aforementioned benefits, it
also
appears
many
challenges in this trend. In terms of natural resources, catering the needs of a number of
international
passengers which requires a high standard of infrastructure that
so
the huge expanding land is one of the prerequisites for construction.
As a result
,
many
animals are on the brink of extinction owing to habitat destruction, if not allocating resource
rightly
.
Furthermore
,
because
of the unawareness of environmental protection releasing an amount of
garbages
to rivers or vendors, plastic bags, cans, papers,
namely
, which adverse environmental effects on ozone layer depletion and soil degradation.
In conclusion
, although it has both countless pros and cons, I suppose it should be less expensive in
international
travel.
However
, the authority should take strict measures reducing a
negative
impact on the environment