First of all, in these days, the job sectors are dynamic and employees are given different tasks and new challenges at a workplace. Knowledge learned from the subjects that only focus on the jobs fails to enhance the overall skill of students. So, it can be catastrophic to a country to have the type of employees who have been taught job-related courses but were not introduced to the vast array of other aspects of education. Most of the companies these days search for people who are more dynamic and have diverse skills than candidates with good grades. For instance, most of the software development companies give priority of a candidate's performance, skill set and analytical ability than his academic results.
Secondly, the competitive job sector all over the world forces many graduates to seek jobs in an entirely different sector than their majors in universities. Thus someone graduated from IT is becoming a banker and someone from a finance background is becoming an HR. Many of those students are setting up their own business instead of doing a job. As a result, they are forced to find alternative works which are not directly related to the courses they took in the university.
Furthermore, employees often need to enrol in different training and professional courses. Those who have finished a university degree with a wide range of subjects would be able to do better in those training programmes and courses. For instance, IT professionals often take the MBA course and this is another good example why the university students should study an extensive range of subjects rather than studying some selective subjects for the jobs.
I, therefore, conclude that a wide range of subjects at the university level is more useful for a student's career and overall development. Hence, job-centric university education sounds a good idea in theory, but in practice, this is a faulty one.
First of all
, in these days, the
job
sectors are dynamic and employees are
given
different
tasks and new challenges at a workplace. Knowledge learned from the
subjects
that
only
focus on the
jobs
fails to enhance the
overall
skill
of students.
So
, it can be catastrophic to a country to have the type of employees who have
been taught
job-related
courses
but
were not introduced to the vast array of other aspects of education. Most of the
companies
these days search for
people
who are more dynamic and have diverse
skills
than candidates with
good
grades.
For instance
, most of the software development
companies
give priority of a candidate's performance,
skill
set and analytical ability than his academic results.
Secondly
, the competitive
job
sector all over the world forces
many
graduates to seek
jobs
in an
entirely
different
sector than their majors in
universities
.
Thus
someone graduated from IT is becoming a banker and someone from a finance background is becoming an HR.
Many
of those students are setting up their
own
business
instead
of doing a
job
.
As a result
, they
are forced
to find alternative works which are not
directly
related to the
courses
they took in the university.
Furthermore
, employees
often
need to enrol in
different
training and professional
courses
. Those who have finished a
university
degree with a wide range of
subjects
would be able to do better in those training
programmes
and
courses
.
For instance
, IT professionals
often
take the MBA
course
and this is another
good
example why the
university
students should study an extensive range of
subjects
rather
than studying
some
selective
subjects
for the jobs.
I,
therefore
, conclude that a wide range of
subjects
at the
university
level is more useful for a student's career and
overall
development.
Hence
, job-centric
university
education sounds a
good
idea
in theory,
but
in practice, this is a faulty one.