A claim has recently been distributed amongst the public stating that any positive changing in our environment would only be accomplished through big corporations or the government. Whilst this could be true due to the authority and finance acquired by each, could it be that individuals, who are part of the society, have no effect?
On the one hand, some people believe that saving our environment depends mainly on the government as this instantly refers to authority and power, which if one have, massive progress programs can simply be achieved by this power. Likewise, enormous companies have got a quiet similar influence but mostly for the huge finance that could be provided to apply any enhancement at different aspects and sites of the environment. For instance, companies that offer planting trees for free. Also, the attempts of the ministry to provide mass cleaning of the roads each weak.
On the other hand, another viewpoint sees that it is far from reality having a person living in his place, yet cannot make the slightest change in it. As long as individuals can cause a negative effect, for example, by throwing garbage anywhere, they definitely can do the reverse and cause a positive influence that helps in boosting the level of the surrounding. I think that the public should stand with the government and companies to accomplish any improvement, furthermore any improvement shall always start with ordinary human beings, the people, to stop any corrupting actions together with trying to make, even if tiny, effective doings.
In conclusion, no one can do the whole work alone. Roles are equally divided where both government or companies along with the public ought to make efforts to cause any change, none can give a 100 per cent influence without the help of the other. And the influence of the public can always be significant and notable.
A claim has recently
been distributed
amongst the
public
stating that any
positive
changing in our environment would
only
be accomplished
through
big
corporations or the
government
. Whilst this could be true due to the authority and finance acquired by each, could it be that individuals, who are part of the society, have no effect?
On the one hand,
some
people
believe that saving our environment depends
mainly
on the
government
as this
instantly
refers to authority and power, which
if
one have, massive progress programs can
simply
be achieved
by this power.
Likewise
, enormous
companies
have
got
a quiet similar
influence
but
mostly
for the huge finance that could
be provided
to apply any enhancement at
different
aspects and sites of the environment.
For instance
,
companies
that offer planting trees for free.
Also
, the attempts of the ministry to provide mass cleaning of the roads each weak.
On the other hand
, another viewpoint
sees
that it is far from reality having a person living in his place,
yet
cannot
make
the slightest
change
in it. As long as individuals can cause a
negative
effect,
for example
, by throwing garbage anywhere, they definitely can do the reverse and cause a
positive
influence
that
helps
in boosting the level of the surrounding. I
think
that the
public
should stand with the
government
and
companies
to accomplish any improvement,
furthermore
any improvement shall always
start
with ordinary human beings, the
people
, to
stop
any corrupting actions together with trying to
make
, even if tiny, effective doings.
In conclusion
, no one can do the whole work alone. Roles are
equally
divided where both
government
or
companies
along with the
public
ought to
make
efforts to cause any
change
, none can give a 100 per cent
influence
without the
help
of the other. And the
influence
of the
public
can always be significant and notable.