Traffic and pollution have been being two major concerns worldwide lately. Several solutions have been proposed to deal with these problems, improving the price of petrol for example. However, whether or not it is effective is debatable. Yet, I personally agree with proposing a more expensive price of petrol to reduce traffic and pollution based on demanding point of view.
To begin with, a classic economic theory clearly argues that the higher the price, the lower the demanding of a product and reversely. By increasing the price of petrol, more people may be more aware of using the vehicle considerably since they need to pay more to fill the tank. This idea can lead to a systematic approach to reducing traffic and air problem through declining possibilities of people to buy fuel needed to run their vehicle and this may result in reducing the number of transportation tool subsequently. For instance, Whitehorse city has imposed the expensive price of fuel and gas which influences the number of vehicles operating and as a result, it comes up as the cleanest air city of the world.
Meanwhile, the other way to overcome traffic and pollution is by optimising public transportation. A good system of public vehicles accomplished by better infrastructure may be delightful to everyone and can attract individuals to use public transportation more often than their own vehicles. This idea certainly can minimise the amount of traffic and pollution as well. Mass rapid train in China and Japan, for example, sophisticated transport and well-managed train schedule have successfully brought up these countries in lessening traffic problem.
All in all, a wide range of solutions is available to help cope with traffic and pollution problem. Improving fuel price and public transportations are true as proposed solutions.
Traffic
and
pollution
have been being two major concerns worldwide lately. Several solutions have
been proposed
to deal with these problems, improving the
price
of petrol
for example
.
However
,
whether or not
it is effective is debatable.
Yet
, I
personally
agree
with proposing a more expensive
price
of petrol to
reduce
traffic
and
pollution
based on demanding point of view.
To
begin
with, a classic economic theory
clearly
argues that the higher the
price
, the lower the demanding of a product and
reversely
. By increasing the
price
of petrol, more
people
may be more aware of using the
vehicle
considerably
since they need to pay more to fill the tank. This
idea
can lead to a systematic approach to reducing
traffic
and air problem through declining possibilities of
people
to
buy
fuel needed to run their
vehicle
and this may result in reducing the number of
transportation
tool
subsequently
.
For instance
, Whitehorse city has imposed the expensive
price
of fuel and gas which influences the number of
vehicles
operating and
as a result
, it
comes
up as the cleanest air city of the world.
Meanwhile, the other way to overcome
traffic
and
pollution
is by
optimising
public
transportation
. A
good
system of
public
vehicles
accomplished by better infrastructure may be delightful to everyone and can attract individuals to
use
public
transportation
more
often
than their
own
vehicles
. This
idea
certainly
can
minimise
the amount of
traffic
and
pollution
as well
. Mass rapid train in China and Japan,
for example
, sophisticated transport and well-managed train schedule have
successfully
brought up these countries in lessening
traffic
problem.
All in all, a wide range of solutions is available to
help
cope with
traffic
and
pollution
problem. Improving fuel
price
and
public
transportations
are true as proposed solutions.