Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree? what other measures do you think might be effective? v.16

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. what other measures do you think might be effective? v. 16
It is believed by some people that raising the price of petrol can solve the ever increasing traffic problem and pollution. In my opinion, I disagree with this belief because it will primarily affect people of low socioeconomic status and there are several other ways to control the pollution problem. The rise in price of fuel to control traffic and pollution is not a good idea as it will primarily affect poor people who already are hand to mouth when it comes to finances. The rich people who already are consuming huge amounts of fuel and contributing to the air pollution will have no effects on their lives, whereas, poor people have to cut down expenditure from grocery or other domestic bills. Their difficult lives will become even tougher with this price hike and will have very little effect on pollution as they contribute to a very small proportion of traffic. Hence price hike is not a good option to solve traffic problems or atmospheric pollution. There are several measures which government can take to control the traffic and pollution. Firstly, the public transport like metro buses and railway tracks should be improved so that people will start travelling in them rather than individual cars which will drastically reduce the consumption of gasoline and eventually less traffic. Secondly, the tax on hybrid cars should be reduced as they consume less oil and hence environmentally friendly. If the prices of these cars are low, people will start purchasing them. Hence, it will be beneficial for both the rulers and individuals in terms of fuel economy. Thirdly, few old worn out cars are responsible for the majority of the carbon dioxide emissions and maximum fuel consumption. Removal of these cars from traffic and replacing them with fuel efficient hybrid cars will successfully control the pollution and it is not possible without governments’ active participation. In conclusion, price hike of petrol is not a good option to control traffic problems rather the improvement of local transport and introduction of fuel efficient hybrid cars are better options.
It
is believed
by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
that raising the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of petrol can solve the
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
ever increasing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
problem and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. In my opinion, I disagree with this belief
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it will
primarily
affect
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
of low socioeconomic status and there are several other ways to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
control
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
problem.

The rise in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
control
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
is not a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
as it will
primarily
affect poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who already are hand to mouth when it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
comes
to finances. The rich
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who already are consuming huge amounts of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
and contributing to the air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
will have no effects on their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
, whereas, poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
cut
down expenditure from grocery or other domestic bills. Their difficult
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
will become even tougher with this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
hike and will have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
effect on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
as they contribute to a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Hence
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
hike is not a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
option to solve
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
problems or atmospheric pollution.

There are several measures which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
can take to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
control
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
.
Firstly
, the public transport like metro buses and railway
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tracks
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improved
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
travelling in them
rather
than individual
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
which will
drastically
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the consumption of gasoline and
eventually
less
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
.
Secondly
, the tax on hybrid
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
as they consume less oil and
hence
environmentally
friendly. If the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
of these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
are low,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
purchasing them.
Hence
, it will be beneficial for both the rulers and individuals in terms of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
economy.
Thirdly
, few
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
old
worn out
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
are responsible for the majority of the carbon dioxide emissions and maximum
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
consumption. Removal of these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
and replacing them with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
efficient hybrid
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
will
successfully
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
control
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
and it is not possible without
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
’ active participation.

In conclusion
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
hike of petrol is not a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
option to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
control
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
problems
rather
the improvement of local transport and introduction of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
efficient hybrid
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
are better options.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
46Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes
Language is the road map of a culture. It tells you where its people come from and where they are going.
Rita Mae Brown

IELTS essay Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. what other measures do you think might be effective? v. 16

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
343 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts