There is a general notion among many proponents of university education, that it should be provided free or cost, only to the younger pupils who score the highest score in examinations. Whereas, there is also a group of people who do not iterate the above point of view, and generally stand in favour, of making university courses available to all, irrespective of marks scored and applicant age. In this essay, we will critically examine both the viewpoints.
Firstly, making academic performance as a sole criteria for university inclusion, will definitely result in an educationally focused diaspora, as the pupils selected will be more academically inclined. Secondly, the whole scheme of things, especially in case of those colleges, which receive a lot of applications, will be more streamlined. Thirdly, this process, will result in producing a future workforce, who have proven their competency in the past, and therefore would be more professionally focused and equipped. According to the proponents of this scheme of selection, pupils who had proven their mettle in the past, will get a fair chance at a college education, and with respect to the mentioned advantages, will help weed out the not so serious candidates.
University education is a basic need, and is very much sought after, especially among the youth, who aspire to land a high paying job, which in turn would help them get settled in life. Basing the eligibility criteria, on marks scored during school years, will result in exclusion of a vast majority of students, which in turn will lead to a lot of dissatisfied youth, vying for a meaningful means of employment. The school curriculum is very general and does not cater to individual competencies. University education is more specific and an aspirant will have chances to score better and prove his mettle. Hence, basing the admissions on marks scored and age, would be a big injustice to all future applicants.
To sum this topic up, we have to balance both the point of views, keeping in mind the current job scenario and competition among the peers for employment. Although the first point of view is theoretically sound and may produce academically brighter results, however, we have to keep in mind the practical scheme of things, before coming to a conclusion. It is impossible to restrict human aspirations, specifically those of students aspiring for a degree, basis school grades. To be fair, to one and all, we should stand by the second viewpoint and be a proponent of free and fair universal study opportunities.
There is a general notion among
many
proponents of
university
education
, that it should
be provided
free or cost,
only
to the younger pupils
who
score the highest score in examinations. Whereas, there is
also
a group of
people
who
do not iterate the above point of view, and
generally
stand in
favour
, of making
university
courses available to all, irrespective of marks scored and applicant age. In this essay, we will
critically
examine both the viewpoints.
Firstly
, making academic performance as a sole
criteria
for
university
inclusion, will definitely
result
in an
educationally
focused diaspora, as the pupils selected will be more
academically
inclined.
Secondly
, the whole scheme of things,
especially
in case of those colleges, which receive
a lot of
applications, will be more streamlined.
Thirdly
, this process, will
result
in producing a future workforce,
who
have proven their competency in the past, and
therefore
would be more
professionally
focused and equipped. According to the proponents of this scheme of selection, pupils
who
had proven their mettle in the past, will
get
a
fair
chance at a college
education
, and with respect to the mentioned advantages, will
help
weed out the not
so
serious candidates.
University
education
is a basic need, and is
very
much sought after,
especially
among the youth,
who
aspire to land a high paying job, which in turn would
help
them
get
settled in life. Basing the eligibility criteria, on marks scored during school years, will
result
in exclusion of a vast majority of students, which in turn will lead to
a lot of
dissatisfied youth, vying for a meaningful means of employment. The school curriculum is
very
general and does not cater to individual competencies.
University
education
is more specific and an aspirant will have chances to score better and prove his mettle.
Hence
, basing the admissions on marks scored and age, would be a
big
injustice to all future applicants.
To sum this topic up, we
have to
balance both the point of views, keeping in mind the
current
job scenario and competition among the peers for employment. Although the
first
point of view is
theoretically
sound and may produce
academically
brighter
results
,
however
, we
have to
keep
in mind the practical scheme of things,
before
coming to a conclusion. It is impossible to restrict human aspirations,
specifically
those of students aspiring for a degree, basis school grades. To be
fair
, to one and all, we should stand by the second viewpoint and be a proponent of free and
fair
universal study opportunities.