Nowadays, both a husband and a wife have to be employed to provide sufficient income for them and their children. While some people argue that this is inevitable, others believe that it harms the development of their offspring. I believe that the latter is true. This essay will discuss both points of view.
It is not only desirable, but also often compulsory for both parents to work in today’s difficult economic climate. Despite the potential problems for the children, employment, either part-time or full-time, is the only solution to have enough funds to raise a child. For example, a family needs to live in an expensive neighbourhood to be able to send a child to one of the best schools. However, the result of this is that a solution has to be found for when children arrive home before their parents. After-school clubs are plentiful; other options include family members looking after the children either voluntarily or on a paid basis, often at a reduced rate. Either the husband or wife may also work overtime, thus providing even more money.
The support of at least one parent being at home at the end of the day is a comforting reassurance for a pupil. For instance, telling a person about a good mark for homework or discussing any problems makes the youngster feel good and strengthens the relationship. Offspring appreciate someone who can provide food and drink. Parents who leave home early in the morning and who do not return until late evening risk creating so-called latchkey youngsters: those who mix with others in the same position leading to undesirable consequences such as involvement in crime, drugs or alcohol. Help with homework as well as providing food and drink are other advantages.
In conclusion, although extra income is always welcome, I believe that the positive aspects of the support of one or more parents far outweigh any monetary gain. Even though a reduced income results from a parent not working, the emotional well-being of a child undoubtedly increases.
Nowadays, both a husband and a wife
have to
be employed
to provide sufficient income for them and their
children
. While
some
people
argue that this is inevitable, others believe that it harms the development of their offspring. I believe that the latter is true. This essay will discuss both points of view.
It is not
only
desirable,
but
also
often
compulsory for both
parents
to work in
today
’s difficult economic climate. Despite the potential problems for the
children
, employment, either part-time or full-time, is the
only
solution to have
enough
funds to raise a child.
For example
, a family needs to
live
in an expensive
neighbourhood
to be able to
send
a child to one of the best schools.
However
, the result of this is that a solution
has to
be found
for when
children
arrive home
before
their
parents
. After-school clubs are plentiful;
other
options include family members looking after the
children
either
voluntarily
or on a paid basis,
often
at a
reduced
rate. Either the husband or wife may
also
work overtime,
thus
providing even more money.
The support of at least one
parent
being at home at the
end
of the day is a comforting reassurance for a pupil.
For instance
, telling a person about a
good
mark for homework or discussing any problems
makes
the youngster feel
good
and strengthens the relationship. Offspring appreciate someone
who
can provide food and drink.
Parents
who
leave
home early in the morning and
who
do not return until late evening
risk
creating
so
-called latchkey youngsters: those
who
mix with others in the same position leading to undesirable consequences such as involvement in crime, drugs or alcohol.
Help
with homework
as well
as providing food and drink are
other
advantages.
In conclusion
, although extra income is always welcome, I believe that the
positive
aspects of the support of one or more
parents
far outweigh any monetary gain.
Even though
a
reduced
income results from a
parent
not working, the emotional well-being of a child
undoubtedly
increases.