It is undeniable that several countries have a tendency of funding sport infrastructure for professional athletes to acquire the global achievements these days, instead of providing basic equipment and land for the public purpose. Although this can bring about some benefits, I strongly argue that its negative aspects are noticeable.
On the one hand, it is understandable why the government should give a priority of infrastructure to the elite athletes to obtain good results for the country. Indeed, winning high prizes in international sports events, like Olympic, is considered not only an effective way to improve country image, but it will also increase the patriotism among young generations and motivate them to exercise more. By improving the national branding, countries believe to have some economic advantages in this competitive world. Therefore, investing an enormous amount of money in building training centres to provide athletes the best condition to practice can boost the national trading and economy, as well as create a respectful job which is worthy to pursue.
On the other hand, such this unequal investment has potential risk of loss. Firstly, providing more public facilities for dwellers is a good way to reduce the burden on health care. Specifically, when citizens are encouraged to take exercise, they can tackle the risk of different common diseases such as obesity, stroke and heart attack, which can help governments save a large amount of money on medical public services. Besides, it is apparent that the tax is contributed by the community. Thus, this funding should be spent to improve people’s life. Consequently, if all the national resources are strongly emphasis on athletes while numerous of the health problem of citizens are ignored, this would lead to the strong opposition from the public, even affecting the security of the nation.
In conclusion, while spending state budget to enhance special facilities to achieve global sport metals is necessary, it is also vital for the government to build public infrastructure for residents for social long – term benefits.
It is undeniable that several
countries
have a tendency of funding sport infrastructure for professional
athletes
to acquire the global achievements these days,
instead
of providing basic equipment and land for the
public
purpose. Although this can bring about
some
benefits, I
strongly
argue that its
negative
aspects are noticeable.
On the one hand, it is understandable why the
government
should give a priority of infrastructure to the elite
athletes
to obtain
good
results for the
country
.
Indeed
, winning high prizes in international sports
events
, like Olympic,
is considered
not
only
an effective way to
improve
country
image,
but
it will
also
increase the patriotism among young generations and motivate them to exercise more. By improving the national branding,
countries
believe to have
some
economic advantages in this competitive world.
Therefore
, investing an enormous amount of money in building training
centres
to provide
athletes
the best condition to practice can boost the national trading and economy,
as well
as create a respectful job which is worthy to pursue.
On the other hand
, such this unequal investment has potential
risk
of loss.
Firstly
, providing more
public
facilities for dwellers is a
good
way to
reduce
the burden on health care.
Specifically
, when citizens
are encouraged
to take exercise, they can tackle the
risk
of
different
common diseases such as obesity, stroke and heart attack, which can
help
governments
save a large amount of money on medical
public
services.
Besides
, it is apparent that the tax
is contributed
by the community.
Thus
, this funding should
be spent
to
improve
people
’s life.
Consequently
, if all the national resources are
strongly
emphasis on
athletes
while numerous of the health problem of citizens
are
ignored
, this would lead to the strong opposition from the
public
, even affecting the security of the nation.
In conclusion
, while spending state budget to enhance special facilities to achieve global sport metals is necessary, it is
also
vital for the
government
to build
public
infrastructure for residents for social long
–
term benefits.