Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city centre, in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city. Give reasons in support of and opposing this traffic congestion policy, and give your own opinion. v.7

In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city centre, in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city. Give reasons in support of and opposing this traffic congestion policy, and give your own opinion. v. 7
It is true that, some countries have an obligation to reduce the traffic congestion in the city center by the rule of fee payment for each drive. However, in this essay explain about the importance of statement and depicts some opposing point of view. Such as, in general, such law would be beneficial in the environment and have sort of dilemma to the public in some extent. To begin with, the merits of traffic payees that, firstly, such action may insist the public to reduce the usage of car unnecessarily, and tend to use for the emergency purpose only. In fact other than the tourists, or officials, make use of car for the daily needs and office going which would be declined by the law and may be give priority to the public transport. This would be advantageous for the department of road and transport. Secondly, owing to the fact that, not only to the traffic but also for the surroundings may be free from congestion and pollution respectively. Declining statics of vehicles would helps the pedestrians to walk freely, and tumble the impacts of over crowding city centers hustle and bustle to some extent. At once, payment may lead to the less usage of cars may mitigate the fossil fuel consumption and would be free from environmental pollution to the core. However, there are some sort of detrimental effects to oppose like, less service to the city centers may affect the travelers, tourists, and daily passengers like employees, students and ordinary people. In other words, extra payment for car might be burden for the people who used car as a transport for the up and down trips. Similarly, owing to the fact that, visitors who is interested to check in city centers might be double think about the visit and which may affect the national income to some extent. To illustrates, people may try to find out alternative passage way to the centers which is non payee and traffic congestion would not be fell down vividly. To conclude, controversial issue of road payee for the car often helpful for the nature and people in same manner. Notwithstanding like any other matter, such rules also had some kind of dilemma to the public in terms of expenditure and inconvenience.
It is true that,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
countries have an obligation to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
congestion in the city center by the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rule
of fee payment for each drive.
However
, in this essay
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explain
about the importance of statement and depicts
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
opposing point of view. Such as,
in general
, such law would be beneficial in the environment and have sort of dilemma to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
extent.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, the merits of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
payees that,
firstly
, such action may insist the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the usage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
unnecessarily
, and tend to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
for the emergency purpose
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
. In fact other than the tourists, or officials,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
for the daily needs and office going which would
be declined
by the law and may be give priority to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
transport. This would be advantageous for the department of road and transport.
Secondly
, owing to the fact that, not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
for the surroundings may be free from congestion and pollution
respectively
. Declining statics of vehicles would
The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: "help"
helps
the pedestrians to walk
freely
, and tumble the impacts of over crowding city
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
centers
hustle and bustle to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
extent. At once, payment may lead to the less usage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
may mitigate the fossil fuel consumption and would be free from environmental pollution to the core.

However
, there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
Possible agreement error. Did you mean "sorts"?
sort
of detrimental effects to oppose like, less service to the city
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
centers
may affect the travelers, tourists, and daily passengers like employees, students and ordinary
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
.
In other words
, extra payment for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
might be burden for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
as
Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply "transport".
a transport
for the up and down trips.
Similarly
, owing to the fact that, visitors who
Did you mean "am", "are", "aren"? Alternatively, check whether the singular of 'visitors' should be used.
is
interested to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
check
in city
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
centers
might be double
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
about the visit and which may affect the national income to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
extent. To illustrates,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
may try to find out alternative passage way to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
centers
which is non payee and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
congestion would not be fell down
vividly
.

To conclude
, controversial issue of road payee for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
helpful for the nature and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in same manner. Notwithstanding like any other matter, such
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
also
had
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
kind of dilemma to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
in terms of expenditure and inconvenience.
16Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
22Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes

IELTS essay In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city centre, in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city. Give reasons in support of and opposing this traffic congestion policy, and give your own opinion. v. 7

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
379 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts