It is true that in some countries, rather than students, governments shoulder the responsibility of paying tuition fees to colleges or universities. This essay will compare the strengths and weakness of this phenomenon, and argue that it is more beneficial.
There is no doubt that governments affording education fees could benefit both individuals and nations. First of all, such action is beneficial to individual development. This is because without the need to worry about the tuition, students are able to put more focus on their study, which will help them develop to the capable and active person in the future. Moreover, social stability and social cohesion will be effectively enhanced as those poor students can acquire same education opportunities as the rich, thereby narrowing the gap between two social classes and creating a harmonious society. Furthermore, through allocating public funds to the education sector, a country’s national quality will be tremendously improved. For example, it is the educational expenses paid by the united government that create a such high-qualified and intelligence population in America.
Nevertheless, the negative impact of bearing the tuitions by local authorities also cannot be underestimated. To begin with, it will impose a threat to economic growth. Because there are no enough public funds to be allocated to the areas that directly stimulate the economy like manufacture sector, the speed of economic development will be slowed down and impaired. Additionally, compared with affording the cost by themselves, students who are waived from this duty may not cherish the study opportunities, which lead to the waste of educational resources.
In conclusion, although some disadvantages are associated with the action that governments paying the high education fees, I am in support of the idea that, it brings more advantages to both individuals and the whole nation.
It is true that in
some
countries,
rather
than
students
,
governments
shoulder the responsibility of paying tuition fees to colleges or universities. This essay will compare the strengths and weakness of this phenomenon, and argue that it is more beneficial.
There is no doubt that
governments
affording
education
fees could benefit both individuals and nations.
First of all
, such action is beneficial to individual development. This is
because
without the need to worry about the tuition,
students
are able to put more focus on their study, which will
help
them develop to the capable and active person in the future.
Moreover
, social stability and social cohesion will be
effectively
enhanced as those poor
students
can acquire same
education
opportunities as the rich, thereby narrowing the gap between two social classes and creating a harmonious society.
Furthermore
, through allocating public funds to the
education
sector, a country’s national quality will be
tremendously
improved
.
For example
, it is the educational expenses paid by the united
government
that create a such high-qualified and intelligence population in America.
Nevertheless
, the
negative
impact of bearing the
tuitions
by local authorities
also
cannot
be underestimated
. To
begin
with, it will impose a threat to economic growth.
Because
there are no
enough
public funds to
be allocated
to the areas that
directly
stimulate the economy like manufacture sector, the speed of economic development will
be slowed
down and impaired.
Additionally
, compared with affording the cost by themselves,
students
who
are waived
from this duty may not cherish the study opportunities, which lead to the waste of educational resources.
In conclusion
, although
some
disadvantages
are associated
with the action that
governments
paying the high
education
fees, I am in support of the
idea
that, it brings more advantages to both individuals and the whole nation.