Many countries are giving overwhelmingly high salary packages to some employers. While it is considered by some people advantageous for a country, in my opinion, the state should minimized and control it.
On the one hand, the high salaries earning by some individuals is advantageous for a country and their right too. This is because some professionals who are possessing sophisticated knowledge, through their hard struggle and devotion, is unprecedented for a country development and prosperity. Which in turn mean, it is their legal and moral right to receive higher salaries than the other individuals in the society, as the work of former is of paramount importance. Take for example, Doctors, Engineers and Bureaucrats, who are earning more money, is owing to their academic and professional experience struggle. Thus, these professionals ought to be liable to higher salaries, due to their critical role in the prosperity of their country and their educational and professional background.
On the other hand, the opponents of the former view argue that, the government should impose a certain limit and control on such behemoth pays and I agree. High salaries is a serious burden on the country’s economy and is not a wise financial decision, especially for underdeveloped nations. That is to say, less fortunate nations are already in financial debt, as they are acquiring economical support and loans from other developed countries; thus, ultimately, it is unreasonable and not viable for them for opt to pay such enormous amounts to certain employers. For instance, a Judge monthly salary is minimum $15000 in Pakistan, which is payed to them through the tax-payer’s money, imposing to them in the form of overwhelming taxes. Therefore, it is unjustifiable to give high pays to some individuals, owing to the burden it causes on the country’s economic sector.
In conclusion, some people argue that it is beneficial for a country that few people are getting high salaries. However, I think, it is detrimental for a country, as it is resulting in strain on the country finance.
Many
countries
are giving
overwhelmingly
high
salary
packages to
some
employers. While it
is considered
by
some
people
advantageous for a
country
, in my opinion, the state should
minimized
and control it.
On the one hand, the
high
salaries
earning by
some
individuals is advantageous for a
country
and their right too. This is
because
some
professionals
who
are possessing
sophisticated knowledge, through their
hard
struggle and devotion,
is unprecedented
for a
country
development and prosperity. Which in turn mean, it is their legal and moral right to receive higher
salaries
than the other individuals in the society, as the work of former is of paramount importance. Take
for example
, Doctors, Engineers and Bureaucrats, who are earning more money, is owing to their academic and
professional
experience struggle.
Thus
, these
professionals
ought to be liable to higher
salaries
, due to their critical role in the prosperity of their
country
and their educational and
professional
background.
On the other hand
, the opponents of the former view argue that, the
government
should impose a certain limit and control on such behemoth pays and I
agree
.
High
salaries
is a serious burden on the
country’s
economy and is not a wise financial decision,
especially
for underdeveloped nations.
That is
to say, less fortunate nations are already in financial debt, as they are acquiring
economical
support and loans from other developed
countries
;
thus
,
ultimately
, it is unreasonable and not viable for them for opt to pay such enormous amounts to certain employers.
For instance
, a Judge monthly
salary
is minimum $15000 in Pakistan, which is
payed
to them through the tax-payer’s money, imposing to them in the form of overwhelming taxes.
Therefore
, it is unjustifiable to give
high
pays to
some
individuals, owing to the burden it causes on the
country’s
economic sector.
In conclusion
,
some
people
argue that it is beneficial for a
country
that few
people
are getting
high
salaries
.
However
, I
think
, it is detrimental for a
country
, as it is resulting in strain on the
country
finance.