In recent times, many countries have started a practice to broadcast the criminal cases on television for their citizens. This essay will discuss few merits and myriad demerits of the above notion in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the positive effects of conducting the criminal trials on media is that it brings great awareness to the society about the different offences done in present times. This awareness motivates the people to take some preventive steps to protect their families. For instance, the gang-rape in Delhi had awaken whole nation and since then, the parents have followed more preventive steps to protect their daughters. Moreover, the trials on the television render good examples to the public by stringent punishment to the culprits, so that in future, the number of potential offences will decline. Thus the criminal trails in public would not only spread awareness but also minimise the rate of crime in the future.
On the other hand, such a practice might cause detrimental effects on the society. Firstly, the adolescents, who might watch such a trial on TV would have a negative impact on their psychology. As a result, they might influence by such offences, and trying to imitate it. Secondly, in many criminal cases, the name of a victim must have to keep confidential for their security of social prestige. For example, a rape victim’s name should not be disclosed in public. Although, the trial of crime is shown in public the identity of the victim could not be protected. Lastly, in some cases, a person is falsely accused of victim to get revenge. In such a case, it the trial is done in public, the social reputation of that person will ruin. Thus, the legislation and its implementation should not be conducted by showing on TV.
In conclusion, the countries must have to form stringent laws to curb the offences. If they would broadcast the criminal trial on TV, then its disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
In recent times,
many
countries have
started
a practice to broadcast the
criminal
cases on television for their citizens. This essay will discuss few merits and myriad demerits of the above notion in the following paragraphs.
To
begin
with, the
positive
effects of conducting the
criminal
trials
on media is that it brings great awareness to the society about the
different
offences
done in present times. This awareness motivates the
people
to take
some
preventive steps to protect their families.
For instance
, the gang-rape in Delhi had
awaken
whole nation and since then, the parents have followed more preventive steps to protect their daughters.
Moreover
, the
trials
on the television render
good
examples to the
public
by stringent punishment to the culprits,
so
that
in future
, the number of potential
offences
will decline.
Thus
the
criminal
trails in
public
would not
only
spread awareness
but
also
minimise
the rate of crime in the future.
On the other hand
, such a practice might cause detrimental effects on the society.
Firstly
, the adolescents, who might
watch
such a
trial
on TV would have a
negative
impact on their psychology.
As a result
, they might influence by such
offences
, and trying to imitate it.
Secondly
, in
many
criminal
cases, the name of a
victim
must
have to
keep
confidential for their security of social prestige.
For example
, a rape
victim’s
name should not
be disclosed
in
public
.
Although
, the
trial
of crime
is shown
in
public
the identity of the
victim
could not
be protected
.
Lastly
, in
some
cases, a person is
falsely
accused of
victim
to
get
revenge. In such a case, it the
trial
is done
in
public
, the social reputation of that person will ruin.
Thus
, the legislation and its implementation should not
be conducted
by showing on TV.
In conclusion
, the countries
must
have to
form stringent laws to curb the
offences
. If they
would broadcast
the
criminal
trial
on TV, then its disadvantages outweigh the advantages.