Smoking is considered to be an insidious killer. It has detrimental effects on both smokers and non-smokers. As such, certain individuals believe that smoking should be banned in public settings. I believe that smoking has harmful effects, so it should be prohibited.
There are numerous reasons that bolster the notion that smoking should be banned in public places. Firstly, it triggers an uncomfortable situation such as a loathsome smelling to individuals who set nearby smokers. Public areas are seen as a perfect place to people gather and entertain their leisure time and breathe pure air. Another reason, it causes chronic diseases such as cancer. Nonsmokers are more likely to be infected by cancer when they sit beside smokers. It has negative effects on human health. Third reason, in public areas, smokers frequently throws their lit cigarettes in different areas and do not concentrate what will occur. Lighted cigarettes usually pose fires. In the aftermath of fires, public places will be destroyed by fires. As a result, they prevent people to assemble in these settings. Smoking should be prohibited because it has adverse impacts on non-smokers.
However, Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. Firstly, each individual has a freedom to seat or carry out favourite activities in public areas. Therefore, smokers have a right to smoke tobacco in such settings. Nonsmokers do not require to sit around smokers. Consequently, they do not disturb non-smokers. The second reason, exposing to smoke for a short period of time has no side effects on non-smokers. As such, non-smokers have the ability to conduct various activities with smokers in public places.
In conclusion, smoking has disgusted smelling and cause harmful consequences to healthy individuals, so it should be banned.
Smoking
is considered
to be an insidious killer. It has detrimental effects on both smokers and non-smokers. As such, certain
individuals
believe that
smoking
should
be banned
in
public
settings. I believe that
smoking
has harmful effects,
so
it should
be prohibited
.
There are numerous
reasons
that bolster the notion that
smoking
should
be banned
in
public
places.
Firstly
, it triggers an uncomfortable situation such as a loathsome smelling to
individuals
who set nearby smokers.
Public
areas
are
seen
as a perfect place to
people
gather and entertain their leisure time and breathe pure air. Another
reason
, it causes chronic diseases such as cancer. Nonsmokers are more likely to
be infected
by cancer when they sit beside smokers. It has
negative
effects on human health. Third
reason
, in
public
areas
, smokers
frequently
throws their lit cigarettes in
different
areas
and do not concentrate what will occur. Lighted cigarettes
usually
pose fires. In the aftermath of fires,
public
places will be
destroyed
by fires.
As a result
, they
prevent
people
to assemble in these settings.
Smoking
should
be prohibited
because
it has adverse impacts on non-smokers.
However
, Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several
reasons
.
Firstly
, each
individual
has
a freedom
to seat or carry out
favourite
activities in
public
areas
.
Therefore
, smokers have a right to smoke tobacco in such settings. Nonsmokers do not require
to sit
around smokers.
Consequently
, they do not disturb non-smokers. The second
reason
, exposing to smoke for a short period of time has no side effects on non-smokers. As such, non-smokers have the ability to conduct various activities with smokers in
public
places.
In conclusion
,
smoking
has disgusted smelling and cause harmful
consequences to
healthy
individuals
,
so
it should
be banned
.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes