The legislation of some nations bans smoking in public areas, which forces smokers to go outdoors to consume cigarettes. From my perspective, the laws are correct since they equally benefit the consumers and society.
Having cigarettes banned in public surrounds improves the population's general health since it reduces passive smoking. That is because the exposure of the polluted air created by cigarettes can severely damage a non-smoker's lungs For instance, it has been proved that an individual can inhale up to forty-five chemicals when breathing cigarettes smoke. Therefore, banning its consume would result in a cleaner and healthier air. Moreover, it also improves the quality of the environment to visitors as it improves the smell and cleanliness of the place, generally damaged by ashes.
Additionally, the laws are beneficial to smokers because it helps to overcome their addiction. The restriction imposed by the legislation builds barriers to keep smoking; consequently, people might be more easily convinced to change their habits. For example, thanks to the launch of laws against public smoking, Brazil had a forty percent reduction in the number of smokers. Furthermore, reducing the public exposure of cigarettes decreases the craving of the drug felt by addicts when they see someone consuming it because this going to be made in private spots.
To conclude, I entirely agree that national laws should vanish the use of cigarettes in public environments since it results in a cleaner and healthier environment for the population. Apart from that, it also helps individuals to stop this bad habit.
The legislation of
some
nations bans
smoking
in
public
areas, which forces smokers to go outdoors to consume
cigarettes
. From my perspective, the
laws
are correct since they
equally
benefit the consumers and society.
Having
cigarettes
banned in
public
surrounds
improves
the population's general health since it
reduces
passive
smoking
.
That is
because
the exposure of the polluted air created by
cigarettes
can
severely
damage a non-smoker's lungs
For instance
, it has
been proved
that an individual can inhale up to forty-five chemicals when breathing
cigarettes
smoke.
Therefore
, banning its consume would result in a cleaner and healthier air.
Moreover
, it
also
improves
the quality of the environment to visitors as it
improves
the smell and cleanliness of the place,
generally
damaged by ashes.
Additionally
, the
laws
are beneficial to smokers
because
it
helps
to overcome their addiction. The restriction imposed by the legislation builds barriers to
keep
smoking
;
consequently
,
people
might be more
easily
convinced to
change
their habits.
For example
, thanks to the launch of
laws
against
public
smoking
, Brazil had a forty percent reduction in the number of smokers.
Furthermore
, reducing the
public
exposure of
cigarettes
decreases the craving of the drug felt by addicts when they
see
someone consuming it
because
this going to
be made
in private spots.
To conclude
, I
entirely
agree
that national
laws
should vanish the
use
of
cigarettes
in
public
environments since it results in a cleaner and healthier environment for the population. Apart from that, it
also
helps
individuals to
stop
this
bad
habit.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes