With the rise of population, scarcity of shelter is now a global issue. To meet this growing demand, new houses need to be constructed in the suburbs. Many people are of belief that making countryside as new homes will definitely destroy its beauty. Meanwhile, I am of the opposite opinion that with limited and restricted usage of rural areas will diversify the crowd. This essay sheds some lights on how new shelters in remote locations might not only help the environment, but also can give a better life to people.
First of all, making new houses in the countryside will diversify the crowd and may shift a plethora of workforce from the urban area to the rural. To illustrate, cities like Mumbai and Bangalore are largely populated with Media and IT professionals because of the job scopes. Shifting MNCs or Industries to the suburbs will eventually shift the employees to those places resulting lesser congested city. Thus, moving to rural side will encourage a less polluted city life and even healthier countryside which was once being polluted by the wastes of urban population.
Secondly, with the growth of the population, there will be better communication and transport to such places which had lacked better facilities and services since long time. Additionally, to meet the growing demands of the public, more local vendors would get job opportunities to expand their business. For instance, the local products such as seasonal fruits and vegetables, which were never exported could easily cross borders and boost the economy. Hence, to encourage countryside harvests it is necessary to make these as shelters.
In a nutshell, in order to protect the cities and balance the ecosystem, it is important to diversify the human habitats. Building new homes without hampering nature will definitely enhance the economy of any country. 
With the rise of population, scarcity of shelter is  
now
 a global issue. To  
meet
 this growing demand,  
new
  houses
 need to  
be constructed
 in the suburbs.  
Many
  people
 are of belief that making  
countryside
 as  
new
 homes will definitely  
destroy
 its beauty. Meanwhile, I am of the opposite opinion that with limited and restricted usage of rural areas will diversify the crowd. This essay sheds  
some
 lights on how  
new
 shelters in remote locations might not  
only
  help
 the environment,  
but
  also
 can give a better life to  
people
. 
First of all
, making  
new
  houses
 in the  
countryside
 will diversify the crowd and may shift a plethora of workforce from the urban area to the rural. To illustrate,  
cities
 like Mumbai and Bangalore are  
largely
 populated with Media and IT professionals  
because
 of the job scopes. Shifting  
MNCs
 or Industries to the suburbs will  
eventually
 shift the employees to those places resulting lesser congested city.  
Thus
, moving to rural side will encourage a less polluted city life and even healthier  
countryside
 which was once  
being polluted
 by the wastes of urban population. 
Secondly
, with the growth of the population, there will be better communication and transport to such places which had lacked better facilities and services since long time.  
Additionally
, to  
meet
 the growing demands of the public, more local vendors would  
get
 job opportunities to expand their business.  
For instance
, the local products such as seasonal fruits and vegetables, which were never exported could  
easily
 cross borders and boost the economy.  
Hence
, to encourage  
countryside
 harvests it is necessary to  
make
 these as shelters.
In a nutshell, in order to protect the  
cities
 and balance the ecosystem, it is  
important
 to diversify the human habitats. Building  
new
 homes without hampering nature will definitely enhance the economy of any country.