With the rise of population, scarcity of shelter is now a global issue. To meet this growing demand, new houses need to be constructed in the suburbs. Many people are of belief that making countryside as new homes will definitely destroy its beauty. Meanwhile, I am of the opposite opinion that with limited and restricted usage of rural areas will diversify the crowd. This essay sheds some lights on how new shelters in remote locations might not only help the environment, but also can give a better life to people.
First of all, making new houses in the countryside will diversify the crowd and may shift a plethora of workforce from the urban area to the rural. To illustrate, cities like Mumbai and Bangalore are largely populated with Media and IT professionals because of the job scopes. Shifting MNCs or Industries to the suburbs will eventually shift the employees to those places resulting lesser congested city. Thus, moving to rural side will encourage a less polluted city life and even healthier countryside which was once being polluted by the wastes of urban population.
Secondly, with the growth of the population, there will be better communication and transport to such places which had lacked better facilities and services since long time. Additionally, to meet the growing demands of the public, more local vendors would get job opportunities to expand their business. For instance, the local products such as seasonal fruits and vegetables, which were never exported could easily cross borders and boost the economy. Hence, to encourage countryside harvests it is necessary to make these as shelters.
In a nutshell, in order to protect the cities and balance the ecosystem, it is important to diversify the human habitats. Building new homes without hampering nature will definitely enhance the economy of any country.
With the rise of population, scarcity of shelter is
now
a global issue. To
meet
this growing demand,
new
houses
need to
be constructed
in the suburbs.
Many
people
are of belief that making
countryside
as
new
homes will definitely
destroy
its beauty. Meanwhile, I am of the opposite opinion that with limited and restricted usage of rural areas will diversify the crowd. This essay sheds
some
lights on how
new
shelters in remote locations might not
only
help
the environment,
but
also
can give a better life to
people
.
First of all
, making
new
houses
in the
countryside
will diversify the crowd and may shift a plethora of workforce from the urban area to the rural. To illustrate,
cities
like Mumbai and Bangalore are
largely
populated with Media and IT professionals
because
of the job scopes. Shifting
MNCs
or Industries to the suburbs will
eventually
shift the employees to those places resulting lesser congested city.
Thus
, moving to rural side will encourage a less polluted city life and even healthier
countryside
which was once
being polluted
by the wastes of urban population.
Secondly
, with the growth of the population, there will be better communication and transport to such places which had lacked better facilities and services since long time.
Additionally
, to
meet
the growing demands of the public, more local vendors would
get
job opportunities to expand their business.
For instance
, the local products such as seasonal fruits and vegetables, which were never exported could
easily
cross borders and boost the economy.
Hence
, to encourage
countryside
harvests it is necessary to
make
these as shelters.
In a nutshell, in order to protect the
cities
and balance the ecosystem, it is
important
to diversify the human habitats. Building
new
homes without hampering nature will definitely enhance the economy of any country.