The growing population has emerged a need of new colonies to accommodate the people. Despite of an availability of the rural landscape of dwellings, many intellectuals are in favour to preserve the countryside by restricting the inhabitants of the people. I strongly agree with the notion and the supporting arguments are discussed further.
To begin with, the major concern is regarding to the indigenous species and ecosystem of the countryside. The exorbitant homes in the rural area would sabotage the shelter of the native animals and plants. Such practice may interrupt the food chain, as well as the health of the ecosystem will degrade. Consequently, many native species could be as extinct. For example, in India, the establishment of industries in the rural area had eradicated many species from the countryside. Thus, to save the natural habitat of the rural region; new colonization should be ceased.
Furthermore, the agricultural productivity is a key element of the domestic economy. The soaring residents would occupy more and more fertile agricultural land, hence the cropping sector will be declined. Moreover, the exploitation of the natural resources by the settlers will raise troubles for the farmers. For instance, the agricultural institute had conducted a survey and revealed that, in developing countries the food productivity had reduced to 35%; due to the large populations in their countryside. Therefore, the academicians put more interest to maintain the beauty and the features of the countryside.
In conclusion, the house is the basic need of an individual. Not only to fulfil this basic need of the innumerable people, but also to maintain the essence of the countryside, the government should take productive actions.
The growing population has emerged a need of new colonies to accommodate the
people
.
Despite of
an availability of the
rural
landscape of dwellings,
many
intellectuals are in
favour
to preserve the
countryside
by restricting the inhabitants of the
people
. I
strongly
agree
with the notion and the supporting arguments
are discussed
further
.
To
begin
with, the major concern is
regarding to
the indigenous species and ecosystem of the
countryside
. The exorbitant homes in the
rural
area would sabotage the shelter of the native animals and plants. Such practice may interrupt the food chain,
as well
as the health of the ecosystem will degrade.
Consequently
,
many
native species could be as extinct.
For example
, in India, the establishment of industries in the
rural
area had eradicated
many
species from the
countryside
.
Thus
, to save the natural habitat of the
rural
region; new colonization should
be ceased
.
Furthermore
, the agricultural productivity is a key element of the domestic economy. The soaring residents would occupy more and more fertile agricultural land,
hence
the cropping sector will
be declined
.
Moreover
, the exploitation of the natural resources by the settlers will raise troubles for the farmers.
For instance
, the agricultural institute had conducted a survey and revealed that, in
developing countries
the food productivity had
reduced
to 35%; due to the large populations in their
countryside
.
Therefore
, the academicians put more interest to maintain the beauty and the features of the countryside.
In conclusion
, the
house
is the basic need of an individual. Not
only
to fulfil this basic need of the innumerable
people
,
but
also
to maintain the essence of the
countryside
, the
government
should take productive actions.