It is indeed that, there is an exorbitant need of the dwellings, in the recent times. Although, the only available landscapes for the colonies are in the rural areas, the intellectuals oppose this trend of exploiting the ecosystem of the countryside; to protect its natural habitats. I strongly agree with the above notion and the supporting arguments are discussed further.
To begin with, the new residences would immerge the environmental issues in the countryside. The soaring population in the new colonies will consume excessive natural resources, which ultimately spoils the ecological balance. Moreover, the home and shelter of many species will be eradicated by occupying the landscape for humans, as well as the aboriginal ecosystem might be collapsing. For instance, momentarily, there are innumerable species are at extinct, due to the unsustainable development of the countryside in humans. Thus, the new buildings in the rural area will raise many issues related to the ecosystem.
Furthermore, the declination in agricultural land would have a negative effect on the economy. The major share of the food is contributed by the rural regions, while they have a crucial role in the domestic economy. Large number of dwellings in the countryside would capture the huge portion of the fertile agricultural land. As a result, the essential sector of the rural area will come to an end, hence the economy of that region has to suffer a lot. For example, in the developing countries, the elevating population in the countryside is minimising their agricultural output, which is directly reflected in their GDP. Thus, the preservation of the countryside is an essential task for the healthy economy.
In conclusion, to build colonies in the countryside will create troubles not only for the natural inhabitant, but also for the local people. Hence, the local regime should protect the countryside by conducting some preventive steps. Thus, the sustainable growth of the society is possible.
It is
indeed
that, there is an exorbitant need of the dwellings, in the recent times. Although, the
only
available landscapes for the colonies are in the
rural
areas, the intellectuals oppose this trend of exploiting the ecosystem of the
countryside
; to protect its natural habitats. I
strongly
agree
with the above notion and the supporting arguments
are discussed
further
.
To
begin
with, the new residences would
immerge
the environmental issues in the
countryside
. The soaring population in the new colonies will consume excessive natural resources, which
ultimately
spoils the ecological balance.
Moreover
, the home and shelter of
many
species will
be eradicated
by occupying the landscape for humans,
as well
as the aboriginal ecosystem might be collapsing.
For instance
,
momentarily
, there are innumerable species are at extinct, due to the unsustainable development of the
countryside
in humans.
Thus
, the new buildings in the
rural
area will raise
many
issues related to the ecosystem.
Furthermore
, the declination in agricultural land would have a
negative
effect on the economy. The major share of the food
is contributed
by the
rural
regions, while they have a crucial role in the domestic economy. Large number of dwellings in the
countryside
would capture the huge portion of the fertile agricultural land.
As a result
, the essential sector of the
rural
area will
come
to an
end
,
hence
the economy of that region
has to
suffer a lot.
For example
, in the
developing countries
, the elevating population in the
countryside
is
minimising
their agricultural output, which is
directly
reflected in their GDP.
Thus
, the preservation of the
countryside
is an essential task for the healthy economy.
In conclusion
, to build colonies in the
countryside
will create troubles not
only
for the natural inhabitant,
but
also
for the local
people
.
Hence
, the local regime should protect the
countryside
by conducting
some
preventive steps.
Thus
, the sustainable growth of the society is possible.