It is sometimes argued that both male and female students will be taken advantage when they are trained in a single-sex school. While I agree with this assertion, I do not believe that dividing into two types of school is an effective way for children.
On the one hand, mixed schools can draw negative impacts on the educational system. Firstly, male chauvinism albeit is being against fiercely, this conception still exist in some public schools. For example, when hosting sports events, some kind of sports like football or basketball is only for boys. Therefore, female undergraduates are likely to be limited in some aspects at school if they study with male counterparts. Secondly, by separating two types of school, students will only concentrate on their study instead of falling head over heels in love. For instance, in my secondary school, a girl who is only in grade eight aborting twice, and she had to stop her studying. As a result, students in single-sex schools are able to perform better in academics because they are not conscious of themselves and are less distracted.
On the other hand, coed education also offers a great array of positive sides for both genders. One benefit is that they can share different ideas together because studies claim that boys differ from girls. For example, boys are said to be better than girls when it comes to Math while females are better in communications skills and Language than males, so mixed schools give them chances to support their strengths to their partners. Another benefit is that co-educational schools can promote socialization since they are used to talk and interact with the opposite sex daily. This can help them not to find it hard to deal with different kind of people in the future.
In conclusion, while I agree that single-sex schools bring a wide range of benefits for school children, I believe wholeheartedly that its disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
It is
sometimes
argued that both male and female students will
be taken
advantage when they
are trained
in a single-sex
school
. While I
agree
with this assertion, I do not believe that dividing into two types of
school
is an effective way for children.
On the one hand, mixed
schools
can draw
negative
impacts on the educational system.
Firstly
, male chauvinism albeit is being against
fiercely
, this conception
still
exist in
some
public
schools
.
For example
, when hosting sports
events
,
some
kind of sports like football or basketball is
only
for boys.
Therefore
, female undergraduates are likely to
be limited
in
some
aspects at
school
if they study with male counterparts.
Secondly
, by separating two types of
school
, students will
only
concentrate on their study
instead
of falling head over heels in
love
.
For instance
, in my secondary
school
, a girl who is
only
in grade eight
aborting
twice, and she had to
stop
her studying.
As a result
, students in single-sex
schools
are able to perform better in academics
because
they are not conscious of themselves and are less distracted.
On the other hand
, coed education
also
offers a great array of
positive
sides for both genders. One benefit is that they can share
different
ideas
together
because
studies claim that boys differ from girls.
For example
, boys
are said
to be better than girls when it
comes
to Math while females are better in communications
skills
and Language than
males
,
so
mixed
schools
give them chances to support their strengths to their partners. Another benefit is that co-educational
schools
can promote socialization since they are
used to talk
and interact with the opposite sex daily. This can
help
them not to find it
hard
to deal with
different
kind of
people
in the future.
In conclusion
, while I
agree
that single-sex
schools
bring a wide range of benefits for
school
children, I believe
wholeheartedly
that its disadvantages outweigh the advantages.