Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.1

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. v. 1
Throughout the time, buildings are eroded and toward to dangerous conditions, therefore many people think that is better demolish it. However, others prove that debilitated constructions have the highest historical value. Since many constructions were built in the past or more earlier century, thereby presently they are eroded and live or walk near such buildings is dangerous. Therefore, the government and people have been increasing spending on keeping old constructions in proper conditions. However, no matter what they are doing the sewerage system, inside infrastructure and the walls slowly disintegrate that lead to more difficult life for residents. Moreover, many old structures are abandoned, therefore attracting homeless or drug addicts. Thus, all previous factors push people think that better knocked down ancient buildings. However, many antique constructions have monumental value because are keeping a memory about the ancient time or famous people from the past, thereby was rebuilt to a museum. Moreover, many such buildings without any changes are attracting many people. For example, ruins town of Caesaria in Israel, or Nesebar of Bulgaria. Therefore, the government in some specific situation has benefits when enhances old construction or encourage archaeologists for digging. For example, the case in Poland there cities have an old town centre there make many events and celebrates. To conclude, society today has an ambiguous choice keep or demolish, and many factors push them on both sides. However, people cannot decline one fact that all old buildings eventually will disintegrate, therefore perhaps more rational do it today and preserve money for something other that more important. Moreover, the technology is changing rapidly, thereby scientist probably figure out some software that allowed demonstrates antique constructions in 3D. Besides, modern house with purpose accommodation more comfortable and provides more facilities for citizens that more important in a tendency is growing population.
Throughout the time,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
are eroded
and toward to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
dangerous
conditions,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
therefore
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that is
better demolish it.
However
, others prove that debilitated
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructions
have the highest historical value.

Since
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructions
were built
in the past or
Use only "earlier" (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
more earlier
century, thereby
presently
they
are eroded
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
or walk near such
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
dangerous
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Therefore
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
have been increasing spending on keeping
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructions
in proper conditions.
However
, no matter what they are doing the sewerage system, inside infrastructure and the walls
slowly
disintegrate that lead to more difficult life for residents.
Moreover
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
structures
are abandoned
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
therefore
attracting homeless or drug addicts.
Thus
, all previous factors push
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that better knocked down ancient buildings.

However
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
antique
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructions
have monumental value
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
are keeping a memory about the ancient time or
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
famous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from the past, thereby was rebuilt to a museum.
Moreover
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
such
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
without any
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
are attracting
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
.
For example
, ruins town of
Possible spelling mistake found.
Caesaria
in Israel, or
Possible spelling mistake found.
Nesebar
of Bulgaria.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Therefore
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
specific situation has benefits when enhances
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
construction
or encourage archaeologists for digging.
For example
, the case in Poland there cities have an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
town
Possible spelling mistake. 'centre' is British English.
centre
there
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
events
and celebrates.

To conclude
, society
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
has an ambiguous choice
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
or demolish, and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
factors push them on both sides.
However
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
cannot decline one fact that all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
eventually
will disintegrate,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
therefore
perhaps more rational do it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
and preserve money for something other that more
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
.
Moreover
, the technology is changing
rapidly
, thereby scientist
probably
figure out
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
software that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
allowed
demonstrates antique
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructions
in 3D.
Besides
, modern
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
house
with purpose accommodation more comfortable and provides more facilities for citizens that more
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
in a tendency is growing population.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes

IELTS essay In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
302 words
7
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts