Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. v.2

In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. v. 2
There are various opinions circulating the issue of imposing a maximum limit to one’s salary. While it may seem more sensible to impose a limit, there are many reasons justifying the act of not doing so. In my opinion, it is more appropriate to refrain from imposing a salary limit as it will not only decrease the happiness of the general population but also lower the standard of living in addition to marring the nation’s image. Firstly, there are clearly advantages in imposing such a limit. Gaps between the upper and lower echelons of society will reduce, causing people to be less discriminating against one another. Furthermore, the country is then able to greater conserve monetary resources and utilize them in meaningful ways, such as improving the quality of the nation’s public education system to better enrich its denizens and prepare them for the competitiveness of modern society. Moreover, crime rates will decrease due to the greater financial equality introduced such that people will be less inclined to steal from others. However, I believe that it is better to not impose a limit. The primary drawback of doing so is a major decrease in the standard of living, as people will have less access to extravagant luxuries due to lesser funds in their possession. Furthermore, as competition is the very impetus driving a nation’s growth, such a limit will only dampen competition in the workforce which will serve to cause lesser productiveness among people ultimately impeding the nation’s growth thus marring the nation’s image. Lastly, the general population will be less happy due to less access to material indulgence and at the deplorable image of the nation. In conclusion, I believe the disadvantages of imposing a limit far outweigh its advantages and it will only serve to harm the general welfare of the nation and its netizens as it will not only lower the standard of living but also the population’s happiness.
There are various opinions circulating the issue of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
imposing
a maximum
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
limit
to one’s salary. While it may seem more sensible to impose a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
limit
, there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
reasons justifying the act of not doing
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
. In my opinion, it is more appropriate to refrain from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
imposing
a salary
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
limit
as it will not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
decrease the happiness of the general population
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
lower the standard of living
in addition
to marring the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation’s
image.

Firstly
, there are
clearly
advantages in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
imposing
such a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
limit
. Gaps between the upper and lower echelons of society will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
, causing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
less
discriminating against one another.
Furthermore
, the country is then able to greater conserve monetary resources and utilize them in meaningful ways, such as improving the quality of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation’s
public education system to better enrich its denizens and prepare them for the competitiveness of modern society.
Moreover
, crime rates will decrease due to the greater financial equality introduced such that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
less
inclined to steal from others.

However
, I believe that it is better to not impose a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
limit
. The primary drawback of doing
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
is a major decrease in the standard of living, as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
less
access to extravagant luxuries due to lesser funds in their possession.
Furthermore
, as competition is the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
impetus driving a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation’s
growth, such a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
limit
will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
dampen competition in the workforce which will serve to cause lesser productiveness among
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
ultimately
impeding the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation’s
growth
thus
marring the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation’s
image.
Lastly
, the general population will be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
less
happy due to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
less
access to material indulgence and at the deplorable image of the nation.

In conclusion
, I believe the disadvantages of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
imposing
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
limit
far outweigh its advantages and it will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
serve to harm the general welfare of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation
and its netizens as it will not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
lower the standard of living
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
the population’s happiness.
13Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
30Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes

IELTS essay In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. v. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
322 words
6
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts