There are nations that offers high paid jobs to only a small scale of individuals, holding certain work responsibilities. However, the ongoing argument between two groups is, as high salaries for a few people is a benevolent matter for the country, similarly there should be a celling for the raise of these payments. Furthermore, will be discussed the good sides of having a high salary for the less number of people in contrast of setting a bar for the remunerations.
To begin with, high paid workers are those who are the emblematic asset of an organization such as, CEOs, Directors etc. because they are the decision making trusties upon whom the company's future is dependable. As a result, large scale of money is invested to satisfy their monetary needs. In addition, the economy of balance is maintained by paying other employees of a firm based on their workload and productivity to reduce the inflation level that might cause if every individual starts earning handsome amounts. For example, Indonesia is a country where inflation rates are on flames due to the liquid money available to the indigenous people. Therefore, less human beings earning greater amount of money is a escapade for a estate from economic inflation.
On the contrary, employees with the belief that compensation with a celling is a pragmatic solution that restrains the dire problem of dividing the workers into two groups such as high paid and low paid. It is better to provide materialistic benefits such as private transportation, apartment to alter the money, so that social stratification can be avoided. For instance, in Pharma industry of Bangladesh there is a common practice amidst the firms which is for the person who reaches managerial position in the organization, company provides personal cars to show their gratitude towards the contributions that were made. Consequently, there won't be any kind monetary changes affecting the country's economy.
To conclude with, having a salary bar is proved to be effective for both employee and the nation because it helps to overcome social discrimination and price hikes at the same time. Finally, I realize that there are individual needs that can be satisfied without remuneration.
There are nations that offers
high
paid
jobs to
only
a
small
scale of individuals, holding certain work responsibilities.
However
, the ongoing argument between two groups is, as
high
salaries for a few
people
is
a benevolent matter for the country,
similarly
there should be a
celling
for the raise of these payments.
Furthermore
, will
be discussed
the
good
sides of having a
high
salary for the less number of
people
in contrast
of setting a bar for the remunerations.
To
begin
with,
high
paid
workers are those who are the emblematic asset of an organization such as, CEOs, Directors etc.
because
they are the
decision making
trusties upon whom the
company
's future is dependable.
As a result
, large scale of
money
is invested
to satisfy their monetary needs.
In addition
, the economy of balance
is maintained
by paying other employees of a firm based on their workload and productivity to
reduce
the inflation level that might cause if every individual
starts
earning handsome amounts.
For example
, Indonesia is a country where inflation rates are on flames due to the liquid
money
available to the indigenous
people
.
Therefore
, less human beings earning greater amount of
money
is
a
escapade for
a
estate from economic inflation.
On the contrary
, employees with the belief that compensation with a
celling
is a pragmatic solution that restrains the dire problem of dividing the workers into two groups such as
high
paid
and low
paid
. It is better to provide materialistic benefits such as private transportation, apartment to alter the
money
,
so
that social stratification can
be avoided
.
For instance
, in Pharma industry of Bangladesh there is a common practice amidst the firms which is for the person who reaches managerial position in the organization,
company
provides personal cars to
show
their gratitude towards the contributions that
were made
.
Consequently
, there won't be any kind monetary
changes
affecting the country's economy.
To conclude
with, having a salary bar
is proved
to be effective for both employee and the nation
because
it
helps
to overcome social discrimination and price hikes at the same time.
Finally
, I realize that there are individual needs that can
be satisfied
without remuneration.