There is no doubt that the ancient premises are part of heritage for any civilization. While nowadays in several metropolitan towns longstanding structures are under demolition, in order to provide adequate area for ultra modern residential schemes. I strongly agree with this initiative, and will support my opinion in subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, the main purpose of destruction of aging constructions is that they are not safe for individuals to live in peace of mind. This is because such premises are vulnerable to the natural disaster, and a risk to safety. For example, in the town where I live, itself surrounded by cracking cottages, which are treacherous, and unsafe for residency. However, these properties are dangerous for citizens, and authorities should replace them with modern accommodation. As a result, the people who live in towns will get safe and secure locality.
On the other hand, my view is that these modern residential projects are crucial because these can help citizens to get a house with essential amenities. The reason for this is that modern architecture is resilient to catastrophes such as earthquake, also built with cutting-edge technology. For instance, the Burj Khalifa in Dubai is a landmark of civil engineering, which is equipped with speedy elevators, centralised heating and cooling system, and automatic climate controlled glass windows. In contrast, older structures cannot accommodate such modern facilities. Therefore, if local governments implement such marvellous plans, then people will get a safe and comfortable place for living.
In conclusion, although the ancient premises are a reflection of our ancestors' efforts. But in my opinion, the prospects of a modern accomodation are considerably on higher side and crucial for the people's well-being.
There is no doubt that the ancient premises are part of heritage for any civilization. While nowadays in several metropolitan towns longstanding structures are under demolition, in order to provide adequate area for ultra
modern
residential schemes. I
strongly
agree
with this initiative, and will support my opinion in subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly
, the main purpose of destruction of aging constructions is that they are not safe for individuals to
live
in peace of mind. This is
because
such premises are vulnerable to the natural disaster, and a
risk
to safety.
For example
, in the town where I
live
, itself surrounded by cracking cottages, which are treacherous, and unsafe for residency.
However
, these properties are
dangerous
for citizens, and authorities should replace them with
modern
accommodation.
As a result
, the
people
who
live
in towns will
get
safe and secure locality.
On the other hand
, my view is that these
modern
residential projects are crucial
because
these can
help
citizens to
get
a
house
with essential amenities.
The reason for this is
that
modern
architecture is resilient to catastrophes such as earthquake,
also
built with cutting-edge technology.
For instance
, the
Burj
Khalifa in Dubai is a landmark of civil engineering, which
is equipped
with speedy elevators,
centralised
heating and cooling system, and automatic climate controlled glass windows.
In contrast
, older structures cannot accommodate such
modern
facilities.
Therefore
, if local
governments
implement such
marvellous
plans, then
people
will
get
a safe and comfortable place for living.
In conclusion
, although the ancient premises are a reflection of our ancestors' efforts.
But
in my opinion, the prospects of a
modern
accomodation
are
considerably
on higher side and crucial for the
people
's well-being.