In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.1
In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job.  v. 1
There is a controlversial debate that pupils should be offered only primary education if their country has high unemployment rate and it is not neccesary to offer secondary education because the chance of finding a job is little. I strongly belive this statement has many flaws such as undefined correlation between education and unemployment. Hence, I do not agree with it.
First of all, we need to understand the reasons behind high unemployment rate. In many cases, the high unemployment rate is due to the economic situation such as high inflation or ability of government to run the economy. Those economics indicators represent the health of the country and likely correlated with job market. Barring pupils from secondary education does not contribute to the progression of economy but also cuts its potential growth rate. For instance, secondary educated pupils should be able to adapt to working environment better than the primary one. Furthermore, people with minimum education may seek for jobs oversea at developed country where there is always a need of immigrant labor worker. Singapore is a good example where there a lot of low educated people working in construction sites and maids working at households. Those oversea jobs are great sources of foreign currency to the home country.
Moreover, the idea of people has no chance finding a job even he or she got secondary education contains a major flaw. Job market is defined by demand and supply of skilled and qualified labor and the size of job market is driven by economy and development, obviously people with higher education is preferred, even that job requires no education at all and even the size of job market is small, there will always be need of labor for any industry. For example, demand of labor is always present at low development country or rural area. This idea is not only solving the economy issue but also represent the weakness in coutry government.
To conclude, high unemployment rate is an issue of any economy and providing pupils with only primary eduation is not the solution to that problem and doing so may limit the country potential growth rate in future. 
There is a  
controlversial
 debate that  
pupils
 should  
be offered
  only
 primary  
education
 if their  
country
 has  
high
  unemployment
  rate
 and it is not  
neccesary
 to offer  
secondary
  education
  because
 the chance of finding a  
job
 is  
little
. I  
strongly
  belive
 this statement has  
many
 flaws such as undefined correlation between  
education
 and  
unemployment
.  
Hence
, I do not  
agree
 with it. 
First of all
, we need to understand the reasons behind  
high
  unemployment
  rate
. In  
many
 cases, the  
high
  unemployment
  rate
 is due to the economic situation such as  
high
 inflation or ability of  
government
 to run the  
economy
. Those economics indicators represent the health of the  
country
 and likely correlated with  
job
  market
. Barring  
pupils
 from  
secondary
  education
 does not contribute to the progression of  
economy
  but
  also
  cuts
 its potential growth  
rate
.  
For instance
,  
secondary
 educated  
pupils
 should be able to adapt to working environment better than the primary one.  
Furthermore
,  
people
 with minimum  
education
 may seek for  
jobs
 oversea at developed  
country
 where there is always a need of immigrant  
labor
 worker. Singapore is a  
good
 example where there  
a lot of
 low educated  
people
 working in construction sites and maids working at households. Those oversea  
jobs
 are great sources of foreign currency to the home country. 
Moreover
, the  
idea
 of  
people
 has no chance finding a  
job
 even he or she  
got
  secondary
  education
 contains a major flaw.  
Job
  market
  is defined
 by demand and supply of skilled and qualified  
labor
 and the size of  
job
  market
  is driven
 by  
economy
 and development,  
obviously
  people
 with higher  
education
  is preferred
, even that  
job
 requires no  
education
 at all and even the size of  
job
  market
 is  
small
, there will always  
be need
 of  
labor
 for any industry.  
For example
, demand of  
labor
 is always present at low development  
country
 or rural area. This  
idea
 is not  
only
 solving the  
economy
 issue  
but
  also
 represent the weakness in  
coutry
  government
. 
To conclude
,  
high
  unemployment
  rate
 is an issue of any  
economy
 and providing  
pupils
 with  
only
 primary  
eduation
 is not the solution to that problem and doing  
so
 may limit the  
country
 potential growth  
rate
  in future
. 
11Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
63Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes