It is argued that in some nations which unemployment rate consistently is higher than the others, most of the students should be attended in primary schools. And it is no good in giving an opportunity to who do not hope to land a future job in order to pusue secondary schools. In my opinion, i totally disagree with this statement due to some below reasons.
Advocating of that fact that studying in primary schools and not going to secondary ones may believe that it is one of the optimal way to alleviate the finacial burden for the government as they do not spend an amount of public money on the school expansion, teacher training fees, and then this means could be used to buy foods, drinks to remote areas without contributions from the local. From my perspective, this is a short-sighted view since this stategy may lead to the the quality of labour workforce. Due to intuitive knowledege and insufficient understanding about higher technology, primary children are unlikely to meet the demand for technological globe.
Further more, i still do not agree with the idea that it is usefulless when offering educational chances for some people who do not have an ambition finding a job because this may lead to some dire consequencies realated to crime rate. In terms of the former drawback, secondary children have stronger desire to express their unique character at all cost, they are likely to be addicted to alcohol, commit the crime which can be seen from the report of increasing rate of junvenile crime.
In my conclusion, the government should take priority over all type of schooling to increase the literacy rate and reduce umemployment rate.
It
is argued
that in
some
nations which unemployment
rate
consistently
is higher than the others, most of the students should
be attended
in primary
schools
. And it is no
good in giving
an opportunity to
who
do not hope to land a future job in order to
pusue
secondary
schools
. In my opinion,
i
totally
disagree with this statement due to
some
below reasons.
Advocating of that fact that studying in primary
schools
and not going to secondary ones may believe that it is one of the optimal way to alleviate the
finacial
burden for the
government
as they do not spend an amount of public money on the
school
expansion, teacher training fees, and then
this
means could be
used
to
buy
foods, drinks to remote areas without contributions from the local. From my perspective, this is a short-sighted view since this
stategy
may lead to
the the
quality of
labour
workforce. Due to intuitive
knowledege
and insufficient understanding about higher technology, primary children are unlikely to
meet
the demand for technological globe.
Further
more,
i
still
do not
agree
with the
idea
that it is
usefulless
when offering educational chances for
some
people
who do not have an ambition finding a job
because
this may lead to
some
dire
consequencies
realated
to crime
rate
. In terms of the former drawback, secondary children have stronger desire to express their unique character at all cost, they are likely to
be addicted
to alcohol, commit the crime which can be
seen
from the report of increasing
rate
of
junvenile
crime.
In my conclusion, the
government
should take priority over all type of schooling to increase the literacy
rate
and
reduce
umemployment
rate
.